Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584244›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Implementing the Family Talk Intervention among families with a severely ill parent or child with palliative care needs- a longitudinal study of the perspectives of hospital social workers.

Ingrid Thermaenius, Maja Holm, Kristofer Årestedt, Camilla Udo, Anette Alvariza, Tina Lundberg, Lars Wallin, Malin Lövgren

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05020158 narecruitingnot on this map

The Family Talk Intervention in Clinical Practice When a Parent With Dependent Children or a Child is Severely Ill: An Effectiveness-implementation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorErsta Sköndal University CollegeRan2021 to 2024Enrolled150ConditionsIllness TerminalArmsFamily Talk Intervention
NCT05365919 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Family Talk Intervention in Clinical Practice When a Parent With Dependent Children is Severely Ill: An Effectiveness-implementation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorErsta Sköndal University CollegeRan2022 to 2024Enrolled400ConditionsTerminal IllnessArmsFamily Talk Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ingrid ThermaeniusDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maja HolmDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristofer ÅrestedtDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Science, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Camilla UdoSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Anette AlvarizaDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tina LundbergDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lars WallinSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Malin LövgrenDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Family Talk Intervention (FTI) is a psychosocial intervention supporting families where a family member has palliative care needs. This study aimed to evaluate how the Family Talk Intervention (FTI) was implemented over time from the perspective of hospital social workers (HSWs) in their everyday clinical practice among families with a severely ill parent or child in need of palliative care. Methods: HSWs ( Results: The HSWs rated the use of FTI high after completing the FTI-education, indicating a positive attitude towards FTI. In the longitudinal analysis, statistically significant changes were seen for two questions in S-NoMAD, where the HSWs' ratings showed that the FTI became more familiar and normalized over time. Generally, the HSWs' ratings of S-NoMAD's main constructs were high and stable over time, indicating a positive view of FTI and its implementation. However, for the single questions, the ratings were slightly more negative to some contextual aspects, such as managerial support and resources. Conclusion: As results showed, HSW mainly rated different aspects of the implementation process as positive, both from the beginning, but also over time. Therefore, the intervention could be judged to have been implemented as a tool to support families when a parent or a child is severely ill. Contextual factors, involving managerial support and resources were rated lower, indicating the importance of those aspects when introducing interventions into healthcare. The result also indicates that the multifaced implementation strategy supported the HSW's everyday clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials, nr, identifier (NCT05365919; 2022-03-04 and; NCT05020158 2021-05-11).

Indexed as

family based interventionhospital social workerimplementationnormalization process theorypsychosocial support

Identifiers

PMID40584244
PMCPMC12202522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.