ReviewBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Emerging bladder-sparing treatments for high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Review in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Classifications and Candidate Biomarkers for Personalizing BCG Therapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Identification of RNA processing-related gene-based bladder cancer subtypes for prognosis and immune landscape assessment.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Improving photodynamic therapy efficacy in bladder cancer using polymer micelle-encapsulated pheophorbide a.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Long non-coding RNAs define favourable biology in high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is a significant global health concern, with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) comprising 75% of cases at diagnosis. High-risk NMIBC (HR-NMIBC) poses a significant therapeutic challenge due to its high recurrence and progression rates despite Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy. Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard for BCG-unresponsive cases but is often met with considerable morbidity and patient reluctance. This has driven research into alternative bladder-sparing therapies (BSTs). Emerging BSTs include immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and novel agents such as nadofaragene firadenovec and nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (IL-15). These therapies have demonstrated promising response rates in clinical trials, offering potential for disease management while preserving bladder function. Gene therapies and targeted agents like CG0070 and EG-70 are also gaining traction for their innovative mechanisms. However, most data are derived from early-phase, single-arm studies, necessitating larger, randomised trials for validation. Device-assisted strategies, including hyperthermic and electromotive drug delivery systems, show potential to enhance intravesical therapy efficacy. Despite advancements, challenges remain in balancing efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness within diverse healthcare settings. This narrative review highlights the evolving landscape of BSTs for HR-NMIBC, emphasising the need for robust clinical evidence to refine patient selection and optimise outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.