Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584211›Full record

ReviewBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Emerging bladder-sparing treatments for high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Clarissa M Gurbani, Yew-Lam Chong, Zhen Wei Choo, David Chia, Puey Ling Chia, Elise Vong, Sharon Ek Yeo, Zhenbang Liu, Thiruchelvam Jegathesan, Jia-Lun Kwok and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Clarissa M GurbaniDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9156-1947
Yew-Lam ChongDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4451-6810
Zhen Wei ChooDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7871-719X
David ChiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The National University Cancer Institute, Singapore at Tan Tock Seng Hospital (NCIS@TTSH) Radiotherapy Centre, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-2224
Puey Ling ChiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8820-3205
Elise VongDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8870-1391
Sharon Ek YeoDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6397-1686
Zhenbang LiuDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0961-2644
Thiruchelvam JegathesanDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2444-6296
Jia-Lun KwokDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9758-6225
Soon Hock KohDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6095-8681
Daniel Zp YongDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9675-2378
Jeffrey J LeowDepartment of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, National Healthcare Group, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6216-1913

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bladder cancer (BC) is a significant global health concern, with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) comprising 75% of cases at diagnosis. High-risk NMIBC (HR-NMIBC) poses a significant therapeutic challenge due to its high recurrence and progression rates despite Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy. Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard for BCG-unresponsive cases but is often met with considerable morbidity and patient reluctance. This has driven research into alternative bladder-sparing therapies (BSTs). Emerging BSTs include immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and novel agents such as nadofaragene firadenovec and nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (IL-15). These therapies have demonstrated promising response rates in clinical trials, offering potential for disease management while preserving bladder function. Gene therapies and targeted agents like CG0070 and EG-70 are also gaining traction for their innovative mechanisms. However, most data are derived from early-phase, single-arm studies, necessitating larger, randomised trials for validation. Device-assisted strategies, including hyperthermic and electromotive drug delivery systems, show potential to enhance intravesical therapy efficacy. Despite advancements, challenges remain in balancing efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness within diverse healthcare settings. This narrative review highlights the evolving landscape of BSTs for HR-NMIBC, emphasising the need for robust clinical evidence to refine patient selection and optimise outcomes.

Indexed as

BCG unresponsivebladder preservationnon-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID40584211
PMCPMC12202947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.