ArticleJournal of public health research2025
Application of a Dengue NS1 antigen based rapid diagnostic test to screen dengue virus infection in clinical settings in Indonesia.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dengue virus (DENV) is hyperendemic in Indonesia and of high public health concern globally. Without an effective antiviral therapy, an accurate diagnosis of the four viruses, DENV1-4, is crucial for patient management and outcome. We aim to assess the diagnostic accuracy and usefulness of a commercial DENV antigen rapid diagnostic test kit in point-of-care conditions. Design and methods: Six-hundred-forty-six patients with fever or history of fever, and without leukocytosis, were enrolled from Tabanan General Hospital, Bali in 2017-2018. All sera were tested for DENV NS1 antigen using the Standard Diagnostics Bioline NS1 Ag rapid test kit and Results: DENV was detected in 10.4% (67/646) of enrolled patients by molecular assays. Only 41 of the positives were found to be positive by the NS1 rapid test. Our findings indicate that the kit was the most sensitive in the first 2 days after disease onset with sensitivity > 75%, and declining at day 3 with a sensitivity of <60%. In addition, the kit was found to be the most sensitive to DENV-2 and least sensitive to DENV-4. Overall, the kit had a sensitivity of 59.7% [95% CI: 44.5-74.9] and specificity of 99.8% [95% CI: 99.5-100.0]. Conclusions: Our evaluation indicated that the rapid diagnostic test is useful for both surveillance and initial detection of DENV infection in community settings. However, it should be supplemented with additional diagnostic methods to ensure accurate confirmation for patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.