ArticleJournal of public health research2025
Prostate cancer screening: Knowledge, attitudes and practices in a sample of men in Ramotswa, Botswana.
Article in Journal of public health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) accounts for 21.6% of all cancers among men in Botswana, ranking as the fourth most common cancer (9%) across all age groups. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to PCa screening among men aged 40 years and older in Ramotswa, Botswana. Design and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted involving a random sample of 362 males aged 40 years and older in Ramotswa. Logistics regression models were utilised to examine associations between socio-demographics, knowledge, attitudes, practices and PCa screening. Results: Of the 362 respondents, 105 (29%) men reported having undergone prostate screening tests either prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or digital rectal examination (DRE). Additionally, 221 (61%) had prior knowledge of PCa, with 114 (32%) receiving information from the radio while fewer than 20% learnt about it from health care providers. Single men were found to be 63% less likely to go for screening compared to married men (AOR = 0.37; [95% CI 0.22-0.61]). Men who were not afraid of the screening test results were twice as likely to go for screening compared to those who were afraid of a positive result for prostate test (AOR = 2.14; [95% CI 1.12-4.09]). Conclusions: While respondents demonstrated above-average knowledge of PCa, fewer than half had undergone a PSA test. Urgent and targeted interventions are needed to address predisposing factors such as fear of prostate screening. Furthermore, the low rates of PCa information dissemination by healthcare workers underscore the need for enhanced engagement of medical practitioners in educating men about PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.