Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584117›Full record

ArticleVeterinary world2025

Evaluation of the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of

Saif Aldeen Jaber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary world, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saif Aldeen JaberDepartment of Pharmacy, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: The escalating global threat posed by antimicrobial resistance has intensified the search for novel antimicrobial agents. Plant-derived bioactive compounds represent a promising reservoir due to their chemical diversity and efficacy against resistant pathogens. Materials and Methods: Results: Methanolic and boiled water extracts demonstrated robust phytochemical profiles (alkaloids, tannins, glycosides, and terpenoids) and significant antioxidant activity (>90% inhibition). Antimicrobial pre-evaluation indicated superior antibacterial efficacy (>90% inhibition) of these extracts, while microwaved water extracts showed moderate activity (~75% inhibition). The methanolic and boiled water extracts exhibited potent antimicrobial effects with MIC values <30 μg/mL against all tested pathogens except Conclusion: Polar solvent extracts of

Indexed as

antibiofilmantimicrobial activityantioxidant activitydrug discoveryphytochemical screeningQuercus coccifera

Identifiers

PMID40584117
PMCPMC12205231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.