Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584080›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

"He is my savior, my guiding light in the dark": imagination and domestication in Chinese women's romantic relationships with AI companions.

Liyao Huang, Wenxue Zou, Yanghao Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liyao HuangSchool of Media, Guangxi Minzu University, Guangxi, China.
Wenxue ZouSchool of Journalism & Comunication, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Yanghao HuangSchool of Media, Guangxi Minzu University, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Existing domestication studies often overlook the impact of sociocultural context and the role of imagination in activating technological characteristics. Methods: This study investigates the influence of domestication techniques on romantic relationships through an exploration of the Human-Machine Love community on Douban (Chinese equivalent of Reddit). A thematic analysis was conducted to examine a total of 2,485 posts written by female users. Results: The analysis uncovers three distinct themes: exploring romantic communication styles, rethinking romantic relationship roles, and challenging dominant gender hierarchies. While AI companions appear to afford women new forms of relational agency, this empowerment is marked by what we term "compromised resistance," a dialectical engagement wherein users deploy technology to contest traditional gendered power structures even as they become enmeshed in new forms of algorithmic dependency. Discussion: The findings position AI companions as ambivalent disruptors of gendered social orders: their subversive potential does not reside in the technology itself, but in the ways it incites users to reimagine and enact more inclusive intimacies. We propose "imagination" as a critical stage in the domestication process, one that expands the analytical focus beyond the physical adoption of technology to include the cultural and symbolic meanings users attach to it. Grounded in a culturally specific analysis of Chinese women's interactions with AI companions, this study offers a theoretically rich and contextually sensitive framework for rethinking digital intimacy within a global landscape.

Indexed as

AI companionsChinadomestication theoryimaginationromantic relationships

Identifiers

PMID40584080
PMCPMC12202606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.