Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40584020›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Comprehensive care management variation between rural and nonrural Maryland Primary Care Program (MDPCP) practices.

Kaitlynn S Robinson-Ector, Rozalina G McCoy, Kellee White Whilby, Dahai Yue, Dushanka V Kleinman, Shuo J Huang, Neil Jay Sehgal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaitlynn S Robinson-EctorUniversity of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, North Bethesda, MD 20852, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1134-8443
Rozalina G McCoyUniversity of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, North Bethesda, MD 20852, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2289-3183
Kellee White WhilbyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD 20742, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0939-8073
Dahai YueUniversity of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, North Bethesda, MD 20852, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1525-6776
Dushanka V KleinmanUniversity of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD 20742, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8241-7867
Shuo J HuangUniversity of Maryland Institute for Health Computing, North Bethesda, MD 20852, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4474-463X
Neil Jay SehgalDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-1115

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary care-based care management services are effective ways to care for high-needs and high-risk patients. Despite experiencing higher chronic disease burden, rural Medicare beneficiaries have decreased access to primary care. The Maryland Primary Care Program (MDPCP) is the nation's largest voluntary state-led Medicare demonstration seeking to improve primary care infrastructure and chronic disease prevention and management. With varying access to primary care resources and health care needs among rural and nonrural Medicare beneficiaries, it is important to assess whether there is variation in the implementation of MDPCP care management among rural and nonrural practices. The analyses used Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Claims and Claim Line Feed data, MDPCP data, and care transformation requirement reports from 2020-2023 to examine rural and nonrural differences in MDPCP primary care practice-based care management comprehensiveness. MDPCP primary care practice rural status was associated with providing more comprehensive care management services when compared with nonrural primary care practices. Rural MDPCP primary care practices also experienced a greater increase in the comprehensiveness of the care management services provided over time. These results demonstrate how state-led Medicare demonstration programs, such as the MDPCP, can improve rural primary care infrastructure and increase access to care management services.

Indexed as

care managementprimary careruralrural primary care

Identifiers

PMID40584020
PMCPMC12202992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.