Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583996›Full record

ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025

Clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: a systematic review.

Ana Alarcia-Lacalle, Andrés Canut-Blasco, María Ángeles Solinís, Arantxa Isla, Alicia Rodríguez-Gascón

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [New antimicrobial substances to combat increasing resistance].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  9. Microbiological eradication of XDRFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. [Beta-lactams and beta-lactamase inhibitors-current developments].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Alarcia-LacalleMicrobiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2970-7766
Andrés Canut-BlascoMicrobiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
María Ángeles SolinísMicrobiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Arantxa IslaMicrobiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-2715
Alicia Rodríguez-GascónMicrobiology, Infectious Disease, Antimicrobial Agents, and Gene Therapy, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3195-6385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health threat that requires urgent solutions. One strategy to decrease resistance of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) to β-lactam antibiotics (BL) is their combination with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLI). Objectives: This systematic review analyses the outcomes, safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of recently approved or under clinical development BLI and BL/BLI combinations. Methods: The systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were used to search for articles from January 2010 to November 2024. The studies were retrieved and screened on the basis of predefined exclusion and inclusion criteria. A quality assessment of the included studies was conducted following the New Castle-Ottawa Scale. Results: A total of 191 articles addressing clinical research regarding the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and PK of new BL/BLI combinations with avibactam, durlobactam, enmetazobactam, nacubactam, relebactam, taniborbactam, tazobactam, vaborbactam and zidebactam were included. According to the published literature, clinical research supports the novel BL/BLI combinations for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections, and hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP) caused by GNB. In spite of that, the development of new BLI effective for class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) is still challenging, being aztreonam/avibactam the only approved combination active against MBL-producing bacteria. Conclusions: Although there has been extensive research to develop new BLI and BL/BLI combinations, only a few have reached the market. More evidence of its usefulness in the real world is still needed.

Identifiers

PMID40583996
PMCPMC12204647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.