Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583951›Full record

ReviewNoro psikiyatri arsivi2025

Examining Psychological Group Interventions for Adult Epilepsy Patients: A Systematic Review.

Ömer Demir, Özlem Sertel Berk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ömer DemirDepartment of Psychology, Doğuş University Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Türkiye.
Özlem Sertel BerkDepartment of Psychology, Istanbul University Faculty of Letters, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is adversely affected in people living with epilepsy (PLWE). Psychological interventions are widely used to enhance HRQoL. The current study aims to review studies examining the effects of psychological group interventions in PLWE. Method: We included randomized controlled quantitative studies published between 2000 and 2023 investigating the effectiveness of psychological group interventions in PLWE aged 18 and over. A total of 10 randomized controlled studies met the inclusion criteria of the review. Results: The reviewed studies included self-management interventions, psychotherapeutic interventions, psychoeducational interventions, and combined interventions involving different types of interventions. The most frequently targeted outcome variables in the interventions were quality of life (QoL) (90%), depression (60%), and self-management (30%). Analyses of the reviewed studies revealed that 67% of interventions targeting quality of life (QoL) improvement, 50% of interventions targeting depression reduction, and 100% of interventions targeting self-management skill enhancement were successful. Furthermore, in studies involving an active control group in which a different group intervention was applied, many of the gains achieved in the intervention groups were also achieved in the active control groups. Interventions conducted online yielded similarly successful results to face-to-face interventions. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that psychological group interventions are beneficial for adult individuals living with epilepsy in terms of many outcome variables. Furthermore, positive outcomes observed in active control groups suggest that group interventions can significantly improve QoL for PLWE beyond the specific content delivered.

Indexed as

Epilepsyhealth psychologyhealth-related quality of lifepsychosocial functioningpsychosocial interventionpublic health

Identifiers

PMID40583951
PMCPMC12205386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.