ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2025
Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Patterns of The Object-Selective Visual Areas.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resting-state functional connectivity related to empathy and sensory processing sensitivity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It has been shown by numerous investigations that the occipitotemporal area has a particular object perception area called the lateral occipital complex, which is composed of lateral occipital (LO) and posterior fusiform (pF) cortices. The aim of this study is to examine the intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) patterns of the object-selective LO and pF regions in order to shed light on the underlying neural mechanisms of object recognition. Methods: 15 healthy participants were included in the study. A standard localizer task was used to identify LO and pF regions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected using two different imaging protocols: high-resolution anatomical image and functional MRI (fMRI) data. Data preprocessing steps were carried out in accordance with standard procedures. After determining the LO and pF regions with activation analyses on the task-based fMRI data, the iFCs of these regions were investigated with functional connectivity analyses carried out on the resting-state fMRI recording. Results: iFC analyzes revealed that LO and pF regions have different connectivity patterns. Lateral occipital had a widely distributed connectivity network, whereas pF showed a more localized connectivity pattern. Lateral occipital had more extensive occipitotemporal, occipitoparietal and motor connections compared to pF. In contrast to this distribution pattern, the connections of the right and left LO were generally concentrated on the ipsilateral sides, while the connections of the pF were bilateral. Conclusion: The results of the study revealed complex iFC patterns of the LO and pF differentiating their functional roles in object perception/recognition. While the pF revealed bilaterally distributed iFC along the ventral visual stream, the extensive and lateralized iFC of the LO suggests its role in integrating visual information including object-related attention and action recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.