ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience
Evaluation of Anxiolytic Effects of
Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of benzodiazepines and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to treat depression has severe adverse effects. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the methanolic leaf extract of Methods: In this study, animals were male Swiss mice weighing 20-25 g. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) phytochemical analysis of MLEJS was performed to verify the different bioactive components. An acute oral toxicity study was performed based on the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guideline, No.423. We investigated the antidepressant and anxiolytic effect of MLEJS (12.5, 25, and 50 mg/kg) using lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced depression and flumazenil/benzodiazepine interaction in GABA (gamma-amino-butyric acid) receptors. The open field test, forced swimming test, and tail suspension test were performed to evaluate the depressive-like behavior in mice. Also, hole-board, light/dark box, elevated plus maze, thiopental sodium, and rotarod motor coordination tests were used as a screening paradigm for the anxiolytic effect of MLEJS. Results: The MLEJS had an anxiolytic-like effect by increasing the exploration of the open arms and reducing the exploration of the closed arms in the elevated plus maze, light/dark box, and hole-board test. Moreover, LPS-induced depressive-like behavior in mice was reversed by the MLEJS (P<0.05). The significant attenuation of proinflammatory mediators and suppression of oxidative and nitrosative stress could be responsible for the observed effects (P<0.05). Conclusion: The MLEJS can be an efficient therapeutic option against anxiety and depression concomitantly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.