ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2025
Low-Fidelity, In Situ, Accessible Pediatric Mass Casualty Incident Simulation to Evaluate and Improve Pediatric Readiness.
Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Existing mass casualty incident (MCI) simulations rely on high-fidelity patient simulators, which are cost-prohibitive and often exclude pediatric patients. To address the need for deployable, low-fidelity pediatric MCI simulations, we developed and evaluated a cost-conscious model to teach the principles of JumpSTART, the pediatric variation of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) algorithm. Methods: In this low-fidelity pediatric MCI simulation, pediatric trauma patients were represented by 2D, life-sized drawings including all pertinent information for triage using JumpSTART. Learners were prehospital and hospital staff with multidisciplinary backgrounds. Learners were divided into two groups and assigned five unique patients across triage and acuity levels. Primary outcomes were the accuracy of assigned triage categories and Broselow lengths, and time to triage completion. Postsimulation surveys were designed to assess learner attitudes about the exercise. Results: Two sessions of the pediatric MCI simulation were conducted (18 and 16 participants, respectively). Triage categories were correctly assigned using JumpSTART for 9 of 10 patients in cohort 1. One patient was over-triaged. All patients in cohort 2 were correctly assigned triage categories. Broselow lengths were correctly assigned to all patients. Median time to assign a triage category per patient was 67 seconds (range 30-135) for the first cohort and 64 seconds (range 30-116) for the second. Participant feedback was universally positive. Discussion: We present an accessible, low-fidelity training model for pediatric MCI, which creates a simple but dynamic hands-on experience for participants around the JumpSTART pediatric triage algorithm and is replicable across environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.