Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583843›Full record

ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2025

An Autistic "Linguatype"? Neologisms, New Words, and New Insights.

Emily Zane, Rhiannon J Luyster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. An Autistic "Linguatype"? Neologisms, New Words, and New Insights.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily ZaneCommunication Sciences and Disorders, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-3984
Rhiannon J LuysterCommunication Sciences and Disorders, Emerson College, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8311-4772

Funding

Learning new words from overhearing in children with ASDR01DC017131 · NIDCD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ARUNACHALAM, SUDHA, LUYSTER, RHIANNON JANET · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017131NIH HHS NIH R01DC017131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this commentary, we present new ideas about autistic neologisms. This essay has two primary goals. First, we argue that an autistic predilection to form neologisms generates intriguing new hypotheses about language in autism, including the possibility that a tendency to use neologisms could be a featural element of an autistic "linguatype" (as in "phenotype"). Second, we suggest that the study of neologism meaning, form, and use can yield insights about a specific speaker and about autistic language, generally. To support both aims, we present the largest collection to date of autistic neologisms. We supply an initial framework for considering and analyzing them, and we apply this framework to some of our collected examples, showing how individual neologisms can offer insights about their creators. Importantly, we suggest that neologism creation may sometimes signify linguistic giftedness, pushing back against traditional notions suggesting autistic neologisms are always evidence of language deficit. We hope this exercise will convince our community that autistic neologisms are deserving of more scientific attention and study. More broadly, by demonstrating the potential value of one feature of autistic language, we aspire to advance collective appreciation for the complexity of autistic language and thought.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderLanguageHumans

Identifiers

PMID40583843
PMCPMC12384733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.