ArticleCancer science2025
A 14-Gene Panel for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Using Circulating Tumor DNA in Different Testing Conditions.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disease Biomarker Detection Using Fluorescence Polarization Assays: Principles and Clinical Applications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Detecting minimal residual disease after surgery is critical for assessing colorectal cancer recurrence risk. Traditional methods, including histology and carcinoembryonic antigen testing, have limited sensitivity. As circulating tumor DNA has emerged as a promising minimal residual disease biomarker, we evaluated circulating tumor DNA detection using a sensitive, targeted 14-gene panel, the Sysmex Plasma-Safe-SeqS colorectal cancer assay, in resectable colorectal cancer cases. We enrolled 46 Japanese patients with preoperatively diagnosed stage II colorectal cancer who underwent surgery at three institutions. Plasma samples were collected pre- and postoperatively. Tumor-informed, plasma-informed, and tumor-naive Plasma-Safe-SeqS colorectal cancer assays were performed. Patients were followed for a median of 1169 (range 148-1476) days using clinical assessments and computed tomography scans. Variants in tumor tissue were detected in 45 of 46 cases (98%). Preoperative circulating tumor DNA was detected in 32 (70%) and postoperative circulating tumor DNA in 16 (35%) patients. Postoperative circulating tumor DNA predicted recurrence with 33%, 38%, and 25% of positive percent agreement for tumor-informed, plasma-informed, and tumor-naive assays, respectively. The tumor-naive assay detected more postoperative circulating tumor DNA-positive cases than the others. As the tumor-naive approach does not require preoperative genetic profiling, it offers significant advantages in cost and ease of implementation in routine clinical practice. Further large-scale studies are warranted to optimize detection strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.