Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583620›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2025

New health taxes in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring potential public support.

Katherine E Smith, Mark Hellowell, Divine D Logo, Robert Marten, Arti Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine E SmithCentre for Health Policy, Department of Social Work & Social Policy, University of Strathclyde, Lord Hope Building, 141 St James Road, Glasgow G4 0LT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1060-4102
Mark HellowellGlobal Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Chrystal Macmillan Building, 15a George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3474-2080
Divine D LogoGhana Health Service Research and Development Division, P.O. Box MB-190 Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-933X
Robert MartenAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Arti SinghSchool of Public Health, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-7460-0119

Funding

Alliance for Health Policy and Systems ResearchInter-Agency Working Group on Health TaxesWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of a fiscal crisis and health pressures, Ghana's government has been exploring additional pro-health taxes. The World Health Organization and World Bank support health taxes as 'win-win' policies that can, if designed effectively, simultaneously improve health and raise revenue for health spending. However, international evidence shows that health taxes can meet political and public opposition. Yet, there is little research that empirically examines public views of health taxes. We compared policy stakeholders' perceptions of Ghanaian public support for health taxes with public views, seeking to understand the basis for potential public opposition, the extent to which evidence can shape public views, and whether tax framing and design influences public support. We undertook 28 semi-structured key informant interviews with stakeholders (from government, advocacy, and business groups) and five focus groups with 38 members of the public (purposefully selected for diversity in gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, and social background). We employed an innovative deliberative design for the focus groups, which enabled us to explore how public views responded to contrasting health tax 'frames'. Stakeholders generally believed public support for health taxes was low, especially for more widely consumed products. Yet, most focus group participants expressed strong support for health taxes, especially those targeting (more widely-consumed) sugar-sweetened beverages. Support increased when health taxes were framed as measures to improve public health and/or create a fairer tax system, and when commitments were made to using resulting revenue for health spending (known as 'earmarking' or hypothecation). However, stakeholders and members of the public shared a concern that business influence in Ghanaian politics presents a key barrier to implementing effective health taxes sustainably. Overall, our findings suggest that health taxes with a clearly-framed health rationale could command strong Ghanaian public support but likely require effective advocacy to overcome political barriers.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPublic OpinionTaxesAdultFemaleFocus GroupsGhanaHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchalcoholexciseGhanasugar-sweetened beveragestaxationtobaccounhealthy commodities

Identifiers

PMID40583620
PMCPMC12448797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.