ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
New health taxes in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring potential public support.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Securing Somalia's health: leveraging sin tax revenues to drive universal health coverage and financial protection for lifesaving care in Somalia's health system-scoping review.Health economics review · 2026Review
- Beyond the sugar tax: public acceptability of a comprehensive food policy bundle in urban Ghana.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of a fiscal crisis and health pressures, Ghana's government has been exploring additional pro-health taxes. The World Health Organization and World Bank support health taxes as 'win-win' policies that can, if designed effectively, simultaneously improve health and raise revenue for health spending. However, international evidence shows that health taxes can meet political and public opposition. Yet, there is little research that empirically examines public views of health taxes. We compared policy stakeholders' perceptions of Ghanaian public support for health taxes with public views, seeking to understand the basis for potential public opposition, the extent to which evidence can shape public views, and whether tax framing and design influences public support. We undertook 28 semi-structured key informant interviews with stakeholders (from government, advocacy, and business groups) and five focus groups with 38 members of the public (purposefully selected for diversity in gender, age, ethnicity, occupation, and social background). We employed an innovative deliberative design for the focus groups, which enabled us to explore how public views responded to contrasting health tax 'frames'. Stakeholders generally believed public support for health taxes was low, especially for more widely consumed products. Yet, most focus group participants expressed strong support for health taxes, especially those targeting (more widely-consumed) sugar-sweetened beverages. Support increased when health taxes were framed as measures to improve public health and/or create a fairer tax system, and when commitments were made to using resulting revenue for health spending (known as 'earmarking' or hypothecation). However, stakeholders and members of the public shared a concern that business influence in Ghanaian politics presents a key barrier to implementing effective health taxes sustainably. Overall, our findings suggest that health taxes with a clearly-framed health rationale could command strong Ghanaian public support but likely require effective advocacy to overcome political barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.