Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583603›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of language & communication disorders

Communicative Participation in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Concept Elicitation Study.

Eline Alons, Nicole Ter Wal, Margreet R Luinge, Caroline B Terwee, Ellen Gerrits, Lizet van Ewijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of language & communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eline AlonsResearch Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1593-5082
Nicole Ter WalResearch Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8740-5590
Margreet R LuingeResearch Centre Healthy Ageing; Youth, Education and Society, Hanze University of Applied Sciences Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2855-3523
Caroline B TerweeEpidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4570-2826
Ellen GerritsResearch Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-0792
Lizet van EwijkResearch Centre Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-8023

Funding

ZonMw 10270032021301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunicative participation is the primary outcome of speech and language therapy for people with communication disorders. However, there are no instruments that measure communicative participation from the perspective of adolescents and young adults. Moreover, little research has been conducted in which adolescents and young adults with various communication problems were asked about relevant participation situations in which they need to communicate. Before a new measurement instrument can be developed, it is necessary to explore adolescents' and young adults' views on their communicative participation.

aimsIn this study we identified situations in which adolescents and young adults experience barriers participating because of communication problems, as well as situations in which they have no difficulties. In addition, we identified aspects of these situations that influence communicative participation in order to gain a deeper understanding of concepts related to communicative participation. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: This concept elicitation study concerned in-depth interviews on self-experienced communicative participation, in which diaries were used as a sensitizing exercise. Participants were asked to keep a diary for 1-2 weeks in which they described their communicative participation during the day. They were asked to describe situations in which they were not able to participate because of their communication disorder, and to describe situations in which they were able to participate. Within 1 week after completing the diary, participants were invited for an in-depth interview, in which the content of the diary was discussed. OUTCOMES AND

resultsTwelve participants were included in this study (7 females, 5 males; 13-27 years) with a variety of communication disorders, including language disorders, speech disorders, hearing loss, or a combination of them. They described a total of 234 situations related to different domains (e.g., communicative participation in school or with friends). Out of these situations, 37 concepts that influence communicative participation were found that were related to the six categories: person (e.g., strangers), topic (e.g., figurative language), pace (e.g., time pressure), location (e.g., school), moment (e.g., energy) and mode (e.g., group conversations). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The results of the study provide understanding in adolescents' and young adults' perspectives on communicative participation. The identified situations form the basis for developing an item bank for measuring communicative participation in adolescents and young adults with communication disorders. In upcoming studies, the items will be extensively assessed on the quality aspects of comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and relevance. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on this subject Communicative participation is the most important outcome of speech and language therapy. However, measurement instruments (preferably patient reported outcome measures, PROMs) to assess communicative participation of adolescents and young adults are scarce. Moreover, perspectives of adolescents and young adults on self-experienced communicative participation, which can lead to the development of a measurement instrument, have not yet been identified. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study is about the self-experienced communicative participation situations mentioned by adolescents and young adults themselves. It presents 37 concepts describing communicative participation that were identified from communicative participation situations mentioned by adolescents and young adults themselves. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This study provides more insight into concepts that describe communicative participation from the perspectives of adolescents and young adults. The results will be used to develop an item bank measuring communicative participation in the target population.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunication DisordersAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultadolescentscommunicative participationitem bankpatient reported outcome measureyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID40583603
PMCPMC12207283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.