Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583568›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews

Quantifying Protein-Glycan Interactions Using Native Mass Spectrometry.

Duong T Bui, Elena N Kitova, Ling Han, Lara K Mahal, John S Klassen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Duong T BuiDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9274-0759
Elena N KitovaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ling HanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-0374
Lara K MahalDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4791-8524
John S KlassenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-7112

Funding

The authors acknowledge funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (J. S. K.), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (J. S. K.), the Alberta Innovation and Advanced Education Research Capacity Program (J. S. K.), and the Canada Excellence Research Chairs (L. K. M.) program.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between glycan-binding proteins (GBPs) and carbohydrates (glycans) are essential to many biological processes relevant to human health and disease. For most GBPs, however, their glycan interactome-the repertoire of glycans recognized and their specificities-is poorly defined. The structural diversity of biologically relevant glycans and their limited availability in purified form, as well as their varied presentation, often as glycoconjugates, and weak affinities are key challenges hindering comprehensive glycan interaction mapping. Native mass spectrometry (nMS), a versatile, sensitive and label-free tool for the discovery of GBP-glycan interactions and quantifying their stoichiometry and thermodynamic parameters, is poised to play a leading role in defining the glycan interactome of GBPs. Here, we review established nMS methodologies, as well as important experimental and instrumental considerations, for detecting GBP-glycan interactions in vitro, and reliably measuring their stoichiometry and affinity. Recent advances in nMS methods for high-throughput library screening, including shotgun glycomics, and quantifying GBP interactions with glycoproteins and glycosphingolipids, are also described.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryPolysaccharidesAnimalsGlycomicsGlycoproteinsHumansProtein BindingGlycoproteinsPolysaccharidesaffinityglycan‐binding proteinsglycansnative mass spectrometrynoncovalent interactions

Identifiers

PMID40583568
PMCPMC13242717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.