ArticleEuropean journal of heart failure2025
Acute dyspnoea in cancer patients: Prevalence of acute heart failure, resource use and diagnostic accuracy of natriuretic peptides.
Article in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAmong cancer patients presenting with acute dyspnoea, the prevalence of acute heart failure (AHF), resource use and diagnostic accuracy of natriuretic peptides remain unknown. This study aimed to address these knowledge gaps. METHODS AND
resultsPatients presenting with acute dyspnoea to the emergency department (ED) were prospectively enrolled in a multicentre diagnostic study. AHF was centrally adjudicated by two independent cardiologists based on current guidelines. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) concentrations were measured at ED presentation. Cancer status, resource use, and long-term outcomes were prospectively assessed. Among 2153 patients, 473 (22.0%) had an active or past cancer. AHF was the most common final diagnosis in both cancer and non-cancer patients (44.4% vs. 51.0%, p = 0.01). Among the alternative diagnoses, pneumonia and cancer-related dyspnoea were more frequent in patients with cancer, while anxiety disorder/hyperventilation was frequent in patients without cancer. Hospitalization rate and length of hospital stay were both higher in cancer patients (p < 0.01). Among AHF-related signs, rales and pleural effusion showed a significant interaction with cancer status and had lower diagnostic accuracy in cancer patients. The area under the curve (AUC) of NT-proBNP was lower in cancer than in non-cancer patients (0.89 vs. 0.93, p = 0.01), while that of BNP was similar (0.93 vs. 0.95, p = ns). This difference was mainly due to active cancers.
conclusionsAcute heart failure was the most common diagnosis in cancer patients presenting with acute dyspnoea. Rales, pleural effusion, and NT-proBNP had lower diagnostic accuracy versus patients without cancer, while that of BNP remained robust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.