Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583490›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

Competing Risks Analysis of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.

Moustafa M A Ibrahim, Matti Uusitupa, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Jaana Lindström, Maria C Kjellsson, Mats O Karlsson

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00518167 (The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00518167 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study: A Follow-up Study on the Effect of a Dietary and Exercise Intervention in the Prevention of Diabetes and Its Vascular Complications

TypeinterventionalSponsorFinnish Institute for Health and WelfareRan1993 to 2023Enrolled522ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsIntensive lifestyle counselling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Response to "Enhance Multistate Models With Clinically Meaningful Graphs".CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  2. Enhance Multistate Models With Clinically Meaningful Graphs.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moustafa M A IbrahimDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-1531
Matti UusitupaInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6052-2001
Jaakko TuomilehtoPopulation Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-0745
Jaana LindströmPopulation Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9255-020X
Maria C KjellssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3531-9452
Mats O KarlssonDepartment of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1258-8297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical studies often observe one interesting event in the presence of other competing events. When both types of events can occur at any time but are only observed at clinical visits (i.e., interval censored), standard survival models may introduce bias in the estimated incidence of the interesting event over time. This can also lead to inflated relative differences between treatment groups. We developed a multi-state model for competing risks analysis of interval censored data from the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. The developed model predicted the participants' clinical outcomes and demonstrated that lifestyle changes significantly decreased the risk of both diabetes and death. The model showed that those who dropped out were at lower risk of developing diabetes, neglecting the assumption of independent censoring. Furthermore, the model identified the most important covariates predicting the future development of diabetes, which should be targeted for therapeutic intervention in likely clinical scenarios. These covariates are baseline BMI, HbA1c, and insulin sensitivity measurements by QUICKI for the onset of developing T2DM, baseline BMI for dropping out, and sex and age as the predictive covariates of death. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00518167.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultAgedBody Mass IndexFemaleFinlandGlycated HemoglobinHumansInsulin ResistanceLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsGlycated Hemoglobincompeting risksdiabetes mellitusinterval‐censored observationsMarkov modelmodel‐based drug developmentmulti‐state modelNONMEMpharmacokinetics‐pharmacodynamicssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID40583490
PMCPMC12439282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.