ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2025
Influence of Field Strength, Sex, and Age on Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling and T
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obesity and reduced renal corticomedullary differentiation on T1 mapping: a population-based UK Biobank study.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Intra- and interobserver variability in renal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: T1 mapping, diffusion-weighted imaging, arterial spin labeling, blood oxygen level-dependent and renal artery flow measurements utilizing manual segmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Influence of Field Strength, Sex, and Age on Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling and TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (PCASL) and T PURPOSE: To assess the effects of field strength, age, and sex on renal perfusion and T STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Sixteen healthy volunteers (eight females, age 41.8 ± 13.3 years) underwent same-day scans at 1.5 T and 3 T, repeated 1 week later. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5 T/3 T multi-delay PCASL with spin-echo EPI readout, inversion-recovery T ASSESSMENT: Multi-delay PCASL was employed to calculate renal blood flow (RBF) and arterial transit time (ATT) maps; single-delay PCASL (PLD = 1.3 s) assessed RBF and technical parameters. Cortical and medullary RBF, ATT, and T STATISTICAL TESTS: Shapiro-Wilk test, analysis of variance, Levene test, Box M-test, Pearson's correlation, within-subject coefficient of variation (wsCV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). P-value < 0.05 was significant.
results3 T yielded significantly higher cortical T DATA
conclusionCortical perfusion parameters and T EVIDENCE LEVEL: Level 2. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.