Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583395›Full record

Observational studyKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2025

Femoral component rotational alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty with functional knee positioning varies across knee phenotypes without affecting clinical outcomes.

Francesco Zambianchi, Gabriele Bazzan, Vincenzo Iorio, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Stefano Seracchioli, Fabio Catani

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco ZambianchiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7634-5692
Gabriele BazzanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ospedale Maggiore di Lodi, Lodi, Italy.
Vincenzo IorioAb Medica S.p.A., Cerro Maggiore, Milan, Italy.
Riccardo Cuoghi CostantiniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Stefano SeracchioliDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Fabio CataniDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis retrospective, observational study aimed to investigate the distribution of femoral component rotational alignment among different knee phenotypes and assess the clinical relevance of femoral component rotation variability in patients undergoing image-based robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) performed with functional knee positioning (FP). It was hypothesized that femoral component rotational alignment can change based on preoperative knee phenotypes, without affecting clinical outcomes.

methodsA total of 256 patients who underwent image-based RA-TKA with the Mako robotic system at a single centre from February 2020 to March 2022 were included. Preoperative robotic-derived computed tomography (CT) data were gathered to determine the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification and the axial orientation of the distal femur. Intraoperative data relative to femoral component rotational alignment were collected. At a minimum of 24 months post-operatively, patients were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR). The distribution of femoral component rotation among phenotypes, as well as the relationships between alignment parameters and clinical outcomes, were assessed by means of linear regression models and one-way analysis of variance.

resultsA total of 219 cruciate retaining TKAs were considered for implant positioning assessment. Femoral component rotational alignment varied significantly among different knee phenotypes, ranging from -6.9° internal to 6.6° external rotation with respect to surgical transepicondylar axis. No significant association was found between femoral component rotation and patient-reported outcomes (FJS-12 and KOOS-JR). Three patients (1.4%) underwent RA-TKA revision, while no patello-femoral complications were reported in any of the patients.

conclusionsIn the setting of image-based RA-TKA performed with FP, the rotational alignment of the femoral component changes significantly among different knee phenotypes. These variations do not affect clinical outcomes at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up and do not result in significant patello-femoral complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemurKnee JointOsteoarthritis, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedPatient PositioningPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesRotationTomography, X-Ray Computedfemoral componentpatient‐reported outcome measuresrobotic‐arm assistedrotational alignmenttotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40583395
PMCPMC12582239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.