Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583381›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

The Client's Goals Are My Primary Responsibility: A Qualitative Study Examining Dietitians' Perceptions of the Barriers and Facilitators to Incorporating Environmentally Sustainable Food Systems in Clinical and Food Services Practice Within Healthcare Settings.

Katy Saucis, Jessica Wegener, Liesel Carlsson, Tracy Everitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dietitians as System Builders: Advancing Equity, Sustainability and Health in Community Nutrition and Primary Care.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katy SaucisSchool of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica WegenerSchool of Nutrition, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Liesel CarlssonSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Acadia University, Wolfville, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-9608
Tracy EverittDepartment of Human Nutrition, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-4828

Funding

This study project was funded by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Insight Development Grant and a University Council for Research Award (St. Francis Xavier University).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrent industrial food systems are not sustainable; they threaten future generations and cause rapid environmental degradation. Shifts to more sustainable food systems (SFS) and associated dietary practices can help reduce the carbon footprint and promote environmental sustainability. Dietitians working in healthcare settings can promote SFS initiatives. This study explored dietitians' SFS practices and their perceptions of the barriers and facilitators within healthcare settings.

methodsThis study analyzed secondary data from a survey of dietitians in Canada, the United Kingdom (UK), Australia, and the United States (US). A convenience sample of dietitians was recruited through national dietetic associations, professional networks, social media, listservs and snowball sampling. Responses were isolated for dietitians working in clinical and food services practice areas and analyzed thematically. The socio-ecological framework was used to understand areas where dietitians have influence within healthcare settings.

resultsThree main themes were identified where clinical and food services dietitians (n = 111) are incorporating SFS into practice in healthcare settings: education, communication, and workplace-related activities. Key barriers included operational and organizational factors (competing priorities), external factors (rising food costs), practice area constraints (limited role clarity), and concern for the client-practitioner relationship (CPR). The CPR tension theme emerged as a challenge for clinical dietitians in incorporating SFS into patient counselling. Facilitators included organizational factors (leadership), research and educational resources, personal factors (interest), and practical tools and resources (national food guides).

conclusionThis study underscores the important work that dietitians are already doing across countries with different yet comparable dietetic professions and health systems. Recognizing that the barriers and facilitators identified in this study will vary between nations, institutions and practitioners, four areas of consideration were suggested, including expanding the client-practitioner relationship to include planetary health; learning from what dietetics and nutrition professionals are doing in other countries; advocating for policy and organizational changes within healthcare, and communicating in the 'cost language' of decision-makers. This study identified that there may be gaps for some dietitians in understanding client-centredness in the context of planetary health. This study highlights the need for further research to support more formalized approaches to the incorporation of SFS and planetary health considerations across all dietetic practice areas.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDieteticsFood ServicesNutritionistsAdultAustraliaCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomUnited Statesdietetic practiceplanetary healthcaresustainable food systems

Identifiers

PMID40583381
PMCPMC12207191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.