ArticleJournal of applied biomedicine2025
Unlocking the secrets of aortic pseudoaneurysms - exploring tensile testing of prostheses, anastomoses, and native vessels in the thoracic aorta: A clinical-engineering correlation.
Article in Journal of applied biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study examines the mechanical properties of thoracic aortic false aneurysms (TAFA) and how the use of vascular prostheses, native vessels, and anastomoses affects their development. This is done through tensile testing, simulating a Bentall procedure, which is the most common surgery leading to TAFA development.
methodsWe conducted uniaxial tensile tests on the native right and left coronary arteries from five cadaveric donors. They were anastomosed to two vascular prostheses in the longitudinal and circumferential directions to assess their mechanical responses under load. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: All anastomosis specimens ruptured on the native vessel side, with no breaches occurring on the prosthesis side. The P2 prosthesis exhibited a mechanical response closer to that of the native vessel compared to the P1 prosthesis. There were no statistically significant differences in wall thickness or mechanical properties between the left and right coronary artery samples, leading to the merging of these groups. The strain of the anastomosis in the longitudinal direction was significantly higher than in the circumferential direction. In both directions, the strain at the onset of rupture was greater than that of the native vessel, with a particularly notable difference in the longitudinal direction. Although there was no significant difference in stress values between the longitudinal and circumferential directions, forces per suture were slightly higher in the circumferential direction.
conclusionUsing the "endo-button buttress technique" with a double-layer anastomosis can help distribute the load and reduce stress. An alternative option is to use a Carrel patch to reinforce the connection between the target site and the conduit. Additionally, autologous pericardium can be employed for reinforcement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40583340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.