Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40583294›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025

Oscillating Magnetic Field Induced Bone Injury Repair by using Drug-Free Micromotors.

Jie Shen, Rui He, Jiajun He, Lipeng Liao, Yongcan Huang, Shaoxiong Min, Xiaoreng Feng, Bin Chen, Ben Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Magneto-X Effects in Magnetic Soft Materials and Their Applications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Oscillating Magnetic Field Induced Bone Injury Repair by using Drug-Free Micromotors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jie ShenShenzhen Key Laboratory of Spine Surgery, Department of Spine Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, P. R. China.
Rui HeCollege of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518055, P. R. China.
Jiajun HeCollege of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518055, P. R. China.
Lipeng LiaoDepartment of Spine Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, PKU-Shenzhen Clinical Institute of Shantou University Medical College, Shenzhen, 518036, P. R. China.
Yongcan HuangShenzhen Key Laboratory of Spine Surgery, Department of Spine Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, P. R. China.
Shaoxiong MinShenzhen Key Laboratory of Spine Surgery, Department of Spine Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, 518036, P. R. China.
Xiaoreng FengDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, P. R. China.
Bin ChenDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, P. R. China.
Ben WangCollege of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518055, P. R. China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7037-3660

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52471256National Natural Science Foundation of China 52475308Shenzhen Medical Research Fund A2303074Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee Projects JCYJ20220531103409021Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee Projects JCYJ20240813115822030Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee Projects SGDX20220530111405038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone injury repair remains a significant clinical challenge due to the tissue's limited self-healing capacity and the complex physiological environment at the defect site. Factors such as insufficient vascularization, poor retention of therapeutic agents, and the lack of effective mechanical stimulation further hinder the success of current minimally invasive treatments, which often rely on the delivery of drugs or stem cells. Here, magnetic gelatin/hyaluronic acid composite hydrogels micromotors are developed, capable of promoting bone regeneration through localized micromovement stimulation, eliminating the need for therapeutic payloads. By harnessing the mechanical forces generated by the micromotors under an oscillating magnetic field, the approach directly enhances osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, providing a novel mechanism for bone repair. The efficacy of this strategy is further validated in vivo using animal models of bone defects, where moderate micromovement stimulation is shown to significantly increase the volume fraction of newly formed bone by approximately twofold, accompanied by well-aligned collagen and organized mineralization, thereby demonstrating substantial regenerative effects. This work presents a paradigm shift in bone repair with a payload-free, minimally invasive solution that overcomes conventional limitations and offers new insights into microrobotics in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationMagnetic FieldsAnimalsGelatinHydrogelsMiceOsteoblastsGelatinHydrogelsbone injury repairhydrogelmagnetic actuationmicromotorsminiature robots

Identifiers

PMID40583294
PMCPMC12462957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.