Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
FoCUS and non-invasive hemodynamics monitoring in neonatal sepsis.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bedside Ultrasound and Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Children with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Correlation Between Hemodynamic Parameters Measured by Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor and Serum Troponin I Levels in Pediatric Septic Shock Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the most encountered pathologies in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in preterm neonates. In this study, we aimed to assess early hemodynamic status in preterm neonates diagnosed with sepsis by electrical cardiometry and compare its utility to functional echocardiography in NICU. This is a case-control prospective observational study that enrolled 70 septic preterm neonates (34 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks gestational age) who were admitted to Tanta University NICU and met the criteria for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis; meanwhile, cases with septic shock were excluded. A non-sepsis group of 70 newborns matched for gestational age and sex was included as a control group. Bedside focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) and electrical cardiometry monitoring were performed on the 2nd day of the clinical diagnosis of sepsis. Stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), and cardiac index (CI) measurements by both echocardiography and electrical cardiometry were significantly higher in the sepsis group compared to the non-sepsis group. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) were significantly lower in the septic group compared to the non-sepsis group. Correlations between electrical cardiometry and focused cardiac ultrasound parameters were significantly positive regarding SV, CO, CI, SVR, and SVRI in all the studied groups.
conclusionsElectrical cardiometry could be considered a useful and promising tool for early assessment of hemodynamics in preterm neonates with sepsis coinciding with echocardiography. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Preterm infants diagnosed with sepsis can develop cardiovascular instability due to the unique features of their cardiovascular function and reserve. • Prompt identification of patients with progression of sepsis severity may be accomplished through frequent clinical assessments and monitoring of the changes in their physiological indices (heart rate, BP, urine output, capillary refill time, and neurologic status) and biochemical variables (blood gas, lactate, electrolytes, and creatinine). WHAT IS NEW: • Electrical cardiometry could be considered a useful and promising tool for the early assessment of hemodynamics in preterm neonates with sepsis coinciding with echocardiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.