ArticleThe world journal of men's health2026
Mapping the Scientometric Landscape of Andrology: Trends, Gaps, and Future Directions in Male Reproductive Health: A Scoping Review.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does the Quality and Readability of Information Related to Varicocele Obtained from ChatGPT 4.0 Remain Consistent Across Different Models of Inquiry?The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis scoping review examines the extent and focus of scientometric studies on male infertility and male sexual dysfunctions (MSDs) while assessing gaps in the current research. It highlights contributions from leading countries, institutions, and authors and identifies important emerging areas of research in male infertility and MSDs. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature search was performed using Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), Scopus, and PubMed following the methodological framework of a scoping review. Bibliometric/scientometric studies on male infertility and sexual dysfunctions were included in this review.
resultsA total of 2,525 articles were assessed for eligibility, with 36 studies included in this review. Through a detailed analysis of the articles, this study identifies significant contributions from countries such as the USA, China, and Italy, with leading institutions and authors playing a crucial role in advancing research on oxidative stress (OS), sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF), varicocele, and assisted reproductive technologies. Notably, OS and SDF have emerged as critical areas influencing both infertility diagnosis and treatment outcomes, while varicocele research remains centered on surgical interventions and their reproductive implications. In the domain of MSDs, erectile dysfunction (ED), especially diabetes-related ED, has seen a surge in research attention, with innovative treatments showing promise for future clinical applications. Despite progress in these areas, the review identifies significant gaps in research on premature ejaculation, Peyronie's disease, and other MSDs.
conclusionsThis review underscores the value of scientometric analysis in andrology, providing a comprehensive overview of current research trends, key contributors, and emerging areas in male infertility and sexual dysfunctions. While significant advancements have been made in several key areas of male infertility and ED, notable gaps remain in underexplored MSDs conditions. By identifying these gaps and regional contributions, this analysis serves as a foundation for guiding future research efforts. Utilizing scientometric insights can foster innovation, improve treatment strategies, and propel advancements in male reproductive and sexual health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.