ArticleThe world journal of men's health2026
Development of a Training Program for Meta-Analytical Research: A Novel Approach to Minimizing Errors in Medical Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Article in The world journal of men's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe Global Andrology Forum (GAF) has developed an innovative training method to equip novice researchers with the fundamental skills to conduct high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) under the supervision of senior experts. This article aims to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of the GAF training program in enhancing these skills. MATERIALS AND
methodsA six-module training program was designed to cover the key steps in SRMA studies, enabling GAF members to conduct high-quality SRMAs. Initially launched as a synchronous (remote) training program, it was later transitioned into an asynchronous format and implemented on the Moodle platform. Trainees participating in the synchronous training program were asked to evaluate the course using a specially designed questionnaire. Participants' assessments of the asynchronous course were collected at various stages. Data from both training models were statistically analyzed.
resultsAmong the trainees who participated in the questionnaire on the original synchronous course (n=101), the majority rated the material and assessments as clear, helpful, and effective in enhancing their knowledge. Additionally, the trainees indicated that the features offered in the training made them feel comfortable and engaged. Of the 29 participants enrolled in the asynchronous program, 22 took part in the assessment. Among them, 12 (54.5%) completed all course requirements, achieving an average score of 83.7%, qualifying them for conducting SRMAs.
conclusionsThe GAF SRMA online training program has proven to be an effective and well-received initiative for equipping researchers with essential skills to conduct high-quality SRMAs. By addressing the diverse needs of trainees through its innovative and flexible design, the program has demonstrated its capacity to enhance knowledge and engagement. The successful implementation of this training program highlights its potential to significantly improve the quality of SRMAs in medical research, thereby contributing to the advancement of evidence-based medical practice on a broader scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.