Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40582961›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

The Effectiveness of Partnerships With Commercial Actors to Improve Food Environments: A Systematic Review.

Laurence Blanchard, Gemma Bridge, Julia Bidonde, Matt Egan, Harry Rutter, Mark Petticrew, Patricia J Lucas, Monique Potvin Kent, Claire Bennet, Stephanie Ray and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Effectiveness of Partnerships With Commercial Actors to Improve Food Environments: A Systematic Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laurence BlanchardFaculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0090-917X
Gemma BridgeSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Julia BidondeSchool of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Matt EganFaculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Harry RutterDepartment of Social & Policy Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Mark PetticrewFaculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Patricia J LucasSchool for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Monique Potvin KentSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Claire BennetPublic Health and Wellbeing Team, Greenwich Borough, London, UK.
Stephanie RayFaculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Cherry LawFaculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Cécile KnaiFaculty of Public Health Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6663-7379

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (England) Public Health Research Programme PHR NIHR128607Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust's Institutional Strategic Support Fund 204928/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partnerships with commercial actors have been proposed as a policy approach to create healthier food environments. We conducted a systematic review to assess their effectiveness for improving food environments and population health at state, national, or international levels. We searched in 14 databases and two websites for real-world evaluations published between 2010 and 2020. Study quality was appraised using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were synthesized narratively by outcome (human, food environment, policy content, and implementation progress), considering their effect direction. Seventeen studies reporting on seven PPPs in four countries were included. Most studies (n = 14) involved food reformulation, especially salt reduction. Three focused on specific settings (the eating out-of-home sector, schools, and convenience stores). There was mixed evidence that partnerships make people buy fewer calories or more school meals (n = 3 studies) or reduce product sodium content (n = 6). Some positive effects were described in one uncontrolled study each for decreasing trans-fatty acid intake and for making healthier options more available in school cafeterias, but these studies had important limitations. Five document analyses highlighted shortcomings in the partnerships, including their limited scope, failure to add value to ongoing actions, varying participation levels, and lack of implementation, monitoring, and reporting. Alternative policy approaches should be considered. This systematic review is registered on PROSPERO as CRD42020170963.

Indexed as

CommerceDiet, HealthyFood ServicesHealth PromotionHumansNutrition PolicySchoolsfood environmentpolicypublic–private partnershipsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40582961
PMCPMC12404887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.