ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025
Understanding vaccine recommendation behaviours among healthcare workers in Senegal: A cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding vaccine recommendation behaviours among healthcare workers in Senegal: A cross-sectional analysis.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the pivotal role of healthcare workers in vaccination programs, there is limited understanding of the factors influencing their vaccine recommendations, particularly in low-resource and rural settings. This study examines the determinants of vaccine recommendation practices among healthcare workers in Senegal.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2024 among 302 healthcare workers in Senegal. A vaccine recommendation score was constructed to assess how frequently healthcare workers recommended vaccines. A typology of psychosocial determinants of healthcare workers' vaccination behaviour was developed using the short version of the Health Professionals Vaccine Confidence and Behaviours questionnaire. Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to identify factors associated with systematic vaccine recommendations.
resultsVaccine recommendation practices among healthcare workers were high, with 60.6% achieving the highest score. The Professionals Vaccine Confidence and Behaviours typology classified healthcare workers into three clusters: 'Highly confident' (57.3%), 'Moderately hesitant' (14.2%), and 'Specific hesitant' (28.5%). Healthcare workers with more than 3 years of experience and those in urban areas were significantly more likely to systematically recommend vaccines. Conversely, healthcare workers displaying higher complacency, lower openness to patients, reduced commitment to vaccination, and limited self-efficacy were less consistent in their recommendations.
conclusionWhile healthcare workers in Senegal demonstrate high vaccine confidence and vaccine recommendation practices, disparities between urban and rural settings highlight the need for targeted interventions. Efforts should focus on enhancing training, resources, and support for healthcare workers in rural areas to address barriers and strengthen vaccine promotion. Future research should explore contextual factors shaping healthcare workers' vaccination attitudes and practices to inform tailored strategies for equitable vaccination uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.