Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40582565›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced research2026

Intestinal microplastic debris, flora dysbiosis, and insidious combined hazards across diverse aquatic and terrestrial organisms.

Tiantian Gao, Yang Jiang, Yapeng Han, Yán Wāng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tiantian GaoSchool of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032 China.
Yang JiangSchool of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032 China.
Yapeng HanSchool of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui 230032 China.
Yán WāngKey Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering of Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009 China. Electronic address: yanwang829@seu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicroplastics and nanoplastics, ubiquitous in ecosystems, pose significant ecological and health risks. At the biological level, plastics impact multiple trophic levels. While numerous studies have confirmed this phenomenon, conflicting conclusions may arise due to variations in particle types or target organisms, underscoring the necessity for additional exploration. AIM OF REVIEW: This review explores their sources, environmental pathways, and interactions with other pollutants, emphasizing the multifaceted threats they present to biodiversity and ecosystem stability. This paper delves deeply into bridging knowledge gaps by presenting emerging evidence of differential effects across trophic levels and organism groups, and highlighting the role of vectors for other environmental pollutants and modifying factors of photodegradation and weathering, offering a nuanced analysis of their synergistic effects on gut microbiota and intestinal health. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: Emerging insights into photodegraded plastics, synergistic toxicities, and their role as pollutant vectors call for immediate action. Ultraviolet radiation accelerates the aging of plastics, enhancing their adsorption capacity for pollutants like heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants, thereby amplifying their toxicity. For instance, aged plastic particles in zebrafish have been shown to induce severe intestinal damage and disrupt microbial balance. Similarly, combined exposures of plastics and antibiotics alter the gut microbiota in organisms, affecting phyla such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. In soil ecosystems, aged plastics elevate heavy metal accumulation in earthworms, intensifying intestinal injury. Our analysis reveals a remarkable ability of the gut microbiota in certain terrestrial organisms to break down microplastics, while specific chemicals help alleviate the intestinal toxicity caused by microplastics and nanoplastics. These findings provide fresh perspectives for future mitigation tactics, underscoring the need for sustainable plastic alternatives, improved waste management strategies, and further research to mitigate the long-term impacts of microplastics and nanoplastics on ecosystem health and functionality.

Indexed as

DysbiosisEnvironmental PollutantsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIntestinesMicroplasticsPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsAquatic OrganismsEcosystemHumansEnvironmental PollutantsMicroplasticsPlasticsWater Pollutants, ChemicalGut microbiomeIntestinal permeabilityJoint toxicityMicrobiota dysbiosisMicroplastics

Identifiers

PMID40582565
PMCPMC13000941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.