ReviewJournal of advanced research2026
Intestinal microplastic debris, flora dysbiosis, and insidious combined hazards across diverse aquatic and terrestrial organisms.
Review in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Possible Role of Gut Microbiota in Polypropylene Microplastics-Induced Immunity and Reproductive Dysfunction in Mice.Toxics · 2026Article
- The effects of microplastics exposure on the growth and development of children.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicroplastics and nanoplastics, ubiquitous in ecosystems, pose significant ecological and health risks. At the biological level, plastics impact multiple trophic levels. While numerous studies have confirmed this phenomenon, conflicting conclusions may arise due to variations in particle types or target organisms, underscoring the necessity for additional exploration. AIM OF REVIEW: This review explores their sources, environmental pathways, and interactions with other pollutants, emphasizing the multifaceted threats they present to biodiversity and ecosystem stability. This paper delves deeply into bridging knowledge gaps by presenting emerging evidence of differential effects across trophic levels and organism groups, and highlighting the role of vectors for other environmental pollutants and modifying factors of photodegradation and weathering, offering a nuanced analysis of their synergistic effects on gut microbiota and intestinal health. KEY SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS OF REVIEW: Emerging insights into photodegraded plastics, synergistic toxicities, and their role as pollutant vectors call for immediate action. Ultraviolet radiation accelerates the aging of plastics, enhancing their adsorption capacity for pollutants like heavy metals and persistent organic pollutants, thereby amplifying their toxicity. For instance, aged plastic particles in zebrafish have been shown to induce severe intestinal damage and disrupt microbial balance. Similarly, combined exposures of plastics and antibiotics alter the gut microbiota in organisms, affecting phyla such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. In soil ecosystems, aged plastics elevate heavy metal accumulation in earthworms, intensifying intestinal injury. Our analysis reveals a remarkable ability of the gut microbiota in certain terrestrial organisms to break down microplastics, while specific chemicals help alleviate the intestinal toxicity caused by microplastics and nanoplastics. These findings provide fresh perspectives for future mitigation tactics, underscoring the need for sustainable plastic alternatives, improved waste management strategies, and further research to mitigate the long-term impacts of microplastics and nanoplastics on ecosystem health and functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.