Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40582359›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment for different piperacillin/tazobactam dosing regimens in renally impaired patients in a non-intensive care unit setting.

Emma Dohmann, Stefan Hagel, Max Kurlbaum, Paul Schellong, Oliver Scherf-Clavel, Güzin Surat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emma DohmannJulius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan HagelInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2999-6131
Max KurlbaumDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Paul SchellongInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Oliver Scherf-ClavelLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Pharmacy, Munich, Germany.
Güzin SuratUnit for Infection Control and Antimicrobial Stewardship, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8400-7865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo optimize antibiotic therapy for pathogens classified as susceptible, increased exposure (I), an increased exposure of piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) is required. However, dosing recommendations are currently only available for patients with normal renal function. The aim of the study was to assess whether the recommended dosages of PTZ for patients with impaired renal function achieve adequate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets for pathogens classified as susceptible, increased exposure (I).

methodsOverall, 49 patients with impaired renal function were included in this study (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 20-40 mL/min: n = 20; eGFR <20 mL/min: n = 19; intermittent haemodialysis: n = 10). Peak, trough and between-dosing interval piperacillin concentrations were determined. The primary endpoint of the study was the probability of target attainment (PTA) for a conservative (fT 60% > minimal inhibitory concentration) and an aggressive PK/PD target (fT 100% > 4× minimal inhibitory concentration). First, a population pharmacokinetic model was developed followed by a model-based simulation.

resultsFor the conservative PK/PD target, a PTA of >90% is achieved in all patients receiving intermittent short infusions, following the dosing recommendations outlined in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). For the more aggressive target, the PTA was <15% across all groups when using short infusions with SmPC dosing. Only continuous infusion with an increased daily dose in patients with eGFRs of 30 and 40 mL/min achieved a PTA of >90% in all patients.

conclusionsDosing according to the SmPC is only sufficient to achieve a conservative PK/PD target. In comparison, simulating an increased dosing with continuous administration attained an aggressive PK/PD target. Offering alternative dosing regimens may be of interest for severe infections with difficult to treat foci caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa even in non-intensive care unit patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationRenal InsufficiencyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalPiperacillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combinationhaemodialysispiperacillin/tazobactamPseudomonas aeruginosasusceptible increased exposure (I)therapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40582359
PMCPMC12569551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.