Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40582013›Full record

ReviewMacromolecular bioscience2025

A Tissue Engineering's Guide to Biomimicry.

Kenny A van Kampen, Carlos Mota, Lorenzo Moroni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Macromolecular bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. A Tissue Engineering's Guide to Biomimicry.Macromolecular bioscience · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kenny A van KampenDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Carlos MotaDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Lorenzo MoroniDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-6025

Funding

ERC Cell Hybridge 637308H2020 FAST 685825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomimicry is a broadly used term in many fields such as in architecture and industrial design to pharmacology and many others. Biomimicry tries to replicate a product or process that occurs in the natural environment. However, due to the broad use of the term biomimicry it becomes unclear what is exactly being mimicked. Specifically, in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) where research is focussed on mimicking complex native tissue, the term biomimicry is often used to designate a single aspect. Therefore, in TERM biomimicry can be clustered into to three different categories correlated to the aspect that is being mimicked: i) mechanical - that has a focus on obtaining the correct mechanical properties of a tissue; ii) morphological - that aims at recreating a scaffold that has a similar morphology to its native counterpart; iii) biological - that has a prime focus on recreating the biological microenvironment that is found in the targeted tissue. This review discusses the strategies and methods how these different forms of biomimicry can be achieved with the current techniques available.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsBiomimeticsRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsHumansbiomimicrytissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40582013
PMCPMC12530705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.