Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581910›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025

Physiologic and mechanical responses to clustered vs. traditional sprint interval exercise approaches.

Refik Çabuk, Yıldırım Kayacan, Juan Manuel Murias, Bettina Karsten

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Refik ÇabukDepartment of Coaching Education, Yaşar Doğu Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3682-3135
Yıldırım KayacanDepartment of Coaching Education, Yaşar Doğu Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Türkiye. kayacan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-2980
Juan Manuel MuriasCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-6453
Bettina KarstenFaculty of Health, Pedagogy & Social Science, CBS University of Applied Science, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-9472

Funding

Ondokuz Mayis Üniversitesi PYO.YDS.1904.22.003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compared responses to a traditional 30-s all-out sprint interval exercise (SIE) session, compared to two SIE sessions divided into clusters, with the aim to assess which of these sessions would result in higher peak oxygen uptake (

methodsTwelve trained males (19 ± 1 years; 176 ± 5 cm; 65.9 ± 6 kg;

resultsPPO

conclusionCompared to the SIE30 session, the clustering-based SIE protocols resulted in higher PPO

Indexed as

BicyclingHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingOxygen ConsumptionAdaptation, PhysiologicalHumansMaleYoung AdultAerobic capacityAerobic trainingMaximal oxygen consumptionPeak power outputRepeated sprint exercise

Identifiers

PMID40581910
PMCPMC12678567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.