ArticleWorld journal of surgery2025
Global Variation in Out-of-Pocket Payments for Cancer Surgery.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Variation in Out-of-Pocket Payments for Cancer Surgery.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCancer is one of the most expensive global health challenges and surgery is needed in most cases. This study aimed to describe out-of-pocket payments for cancer surgery across country income groups.
methodsThis was a preplanned secondary analysis from an international prospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing cancer surgery in October 2020. Out-of-pocket payments (OOPP) to cover most of the cost of cancer surgery were compared across country income groups. Other funding sources were also described as follows: public funds, insurance, or others. A logistic regression model was used to identify variables independently associated with OOPP in low- and middle-income countries.
resultsThere were 24,498 patients included from 1332 hospitals from 108 countries. Overall, 6.4% (1571/24,498) had OOPP to cover most of the cost of their cancer surgery. OOPP rates varied across country income groups: 0.5% (89/16,680) in HICs, 5.7% (272/4784) in UMICs, 38.6% (1008/2614) in LMICs, and 48.1% (202/429) in LICs. Besides the country income, male sex (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.32, and p = 0.024) and elective surgery (OR 1.31, 1.04-1.67, and p = 0.022) were associated with OOPP for cancer surgery. DISCUSSION: Patients accessing cancer surgery in LMICs are at an increased risk of catastrophic expenditure. Governments should prevent this by developing health insurance plans that cover elective cancer surgery, possibly involving diverse stakeholders. The interpretation of gender-related risks demands deeper understanding of the ability to pay out-of-pocket and access care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.