Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581762›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2025

Hypothetical Purchase Task Metrics Predict Responding on an Incentivized Purchase Task for Full and Reduced Nicotine Cigarettes.

Brett W Gelino, Derek D Reed, Gideon P Naudé, Jessica C Harbaugh, Rebekah D Schlitzer, Melissa Mercincavage, Andrew A Strasser, Matthew W Johnson, Justin C Strickland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brett W GelinoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-3627
Derek D ReedInstitutes for Behavior Resources, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA.
Gideon P NaudéDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jessica C HarbaughDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Rebekah D SchlitzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Melissa MercincavageInstitute for Nicotine & Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Andrew A StrasserDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA.
Matthew W JohnsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Justin C StricklandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1077-0394

Funding

Greenwashing cigarettes: Perceptual and behavioral evidence of inaccurate modified risk advertisingR01DA049814 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MORAN, MEGHAN BRIDGID · 2020 to 2022
$1.4M
Behavioral Economics of Reduced-Nicotine Cigarettes: Interaction of Expectancy and Nicotine Dose ReductionR03DA054098 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STRICKLAND, JUSTIN CHARLES · 2021 to 2021
$123k
NIDA Drug Supply ProgramNIDA NIH HHS R01DA049814NIDA NIH HHS R03DA054098NIDA NIH HHS T32DA07209US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products and National Cancer Institute U54CA229973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purchase task procedure offers a rapid data collection method for evaluating drug value in contexts for which drug self-administration is practically or ethically limited. This study addresses a methodological concern with purchase task use-the correspondence between hypothetical and real commodity valuation-by testing the say-do and hypothetical-incentivized correspondence of the task for tobacco demand across varied tobacco products. AIMS AND

methodsParticipants (N = 24; 50% female) completed study sessions characterized by changing cigarette product characteristics. During each session, participants sampled a cigarette varying in blinded nicotine content and nicotine expectancy and completed hypothetical and incentivized purchase tasks for that product. The incentivized task prompted participants to report the number of session cigarettes they would purchase for a within-session self-administration period while the hypothetical task evaluated simulated purchases of cigarette packs for a typical smoking week. Measures of correspondence were evaluated across purchase task metrics.

resultsAcross conditions, purchasing and self-administration in the incentivized purchase task and self-administration period showed a strong positive correlation (r = .70, p < .001). Average correlations for each metric between task types ranged from r = .43 [Omax] to r = .55 [breakpoint]. Linear mixed-effects modeling revealed statistically significant predictive relations between hypothetical and incentivized task metrics for Q0 (p < .001), ⍺ (p < .001), intensity (p < .001), Omax (p = .04), Pmax (p = .01), and breakpoint (p < .001).

conclusionsData uphold the correspondence between hypothetical and incentivized task responding in the context of familiar and novel cigarette products. Broadly, data provide continued support for the purchase task method as a reliable and ecologically valid method of assessing reinforcer valuation. IMPLICATIONS: A limited body of research precludes conclusions regarding the say-do correspondence of simulated purchase tasks. This study examines correspondence across a hypothetical task prompting participants to report tobacco valuation in units of packs and an incentivized task prompting participants to report single cigarette consumption for use during a within-session self-administration period. The task correspondence observed in this study supports the continued use of behavioral economic simulated purchase tasks for application in difficult-to-study contexts.

Indexed as

CommerceConsumer BehaviorMotivationNicotineTobacco ProductsAdultFemaleHumansMaleSelf AdministrationYoung AdultNicotine

Identifiers

PMID40581762
PMCPMC12641172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.