Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581742›Full record

Observational studyJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2025

Recovery of BMD after pregnancy and breastfeeding-a 10-yr prospective observational study of 25-yr-old women.

Lisa Egund, Linnea Malmgren, Anthony D Woolf, Fiona E McGuigan, Kristina E Akesson

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bone health across the lifespan in African populations affected by HIV.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Parity and lactation cause transient bone loss but are not risk factors for osteoporosis later in life.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Pregnancy and Lactation Associated Bone Fragility.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa EgundLund University, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0982-8827
Linnea MalmgrenLund University, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3296-7083
Anthony D WoolfLund University, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8482-8056
Fiona E McGuiganLund University, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8033-9981
Kristina E AkessonLund University, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3024-2804

Funding

Albert Påhlsson FoundationAlfred Österlund FoundationGreta and Johan Kock FoundationSwedish Research Council K2018-02981Swedish Research Council K2022-00616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pregnancy and lactation require large amounts of calcium, potentially depleting the young-adult bone. This study investigated BMD and fluctuations of BMD resulting from parity and lactation in the PEAK-25 cohort, a prospective observational study of women all aged 25 at inclusion and 35 at follow-up. The analyses used women who were nulliparous at baseline and parous (n = 573) or nulliparous (n = 177) 10 yr later. Parity, regardless of number of pregnancies, had no negative impact; indeed, spine BMD at age 35 was higher (2.1%; p = .043). Likewise, BMD did not differ in women who breastfed, were nonlactating or nulliparous. Even the cumulative duration of breastfeeding did not make a difference. Overall, regardless of parity, in the cohort, by age 35 BMD was already decreasing, with overall losses at the FN (∆, -3.4%) and TH (∆, -2.7%), although not the spine (∆, 0.9%). Yet, BMD fluctuations associated with pregnancy, lactation, and weaning were seen in the short term. Comparing those pregnant >24 mo with those <24 mo prior to DXA, BMD was lowest in women more recently pregnant (FN, -2.2%, TH -2.7%). Women pregnant within 12 mo had 4% lower TH BMD compared with more than 36 mo (p = .054, padjusted = .032). Cumulative duration of breastfeeding was associated with bone loss, particularly beyond 15 mo (FN: ∆, -4.3%; TH: ∆, -3.7%) and lower spine BMD accretion. Despite such periods of loss, BMD recovers, evidenced by time-from-weaning to DXA. Women weaning within 6 mo of measurement had lower FN BMD than those where the interval was >24 mo (6.6% vs 1.7%; p < .001). In conclusion and despite repeated fluctuations in BMD resulting from the physiological demands of multiple pregnancies and periods of breastfeeding, BMD recovers and ultimately does not differ from that of identically aged women without children.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBreast FeedingAdultFemaleHumansLactationParityPregnancyProspective StudiesBMDbone losslactationparitywomen

Identifiers

PMID40581742
PMCPMC12685719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.