Observational studyEndocrine2025
Lenvatinib for unresectable anaplastic thyroid cancer: real-world experiences in multi-institutional study.
Observational study in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor microenvironment-guided targeted and immunotherapy in anaplastic thyroid cancer: a literature review from preclinical models to clinical translation.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Lenvatinib as an urgent initial therapy in thyroid cancer with remarkable laryngotracheal invasion.European thyroid journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis. Lenvatinib has demonstrated moderate efficacy and is approved for unresectable ATC treatment in Japan. However, some patients are unable to tolerate the standard 24 mg daily dose and require dose reductions or interruptions due to its high incidence of adverse effects. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of lenvatinib in patients with ATC, particularly assessing outcomes with reduced dosages across multiple institutions.
methodsSixteen patients diagnosed with ATC and treated with lenvatinib were evaluated retrospectively. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated. In addition, patients were divided into two groups based on 24 mg daily dose or reduced initial dose, and their therapeutic outcomes were compared.
resultsThe objective response rate was 31%, and the median OS and PFS were 2.2 and 1.7 months, respectively. Among the 16 patients, 11 (69%) initiated treatment with 24 mg daily, while the remaining 5 (31%) received a reduced dose. The median OS and PFS were 2.0 months and 1.4 months, respectively, among patients in the 24 mg daily group, compared to 6.2 months and 2.4 months, respectively, among patients in the reduced dosage group.
conclusionOur study demonstrated that lenvatinib has moderate efficacy for ATC. In addition, initiating treatment at a reduced dose could provide therapeutic benefit. Lenvatinib may serve as a treatment option for unresectable ATC when targeted therapies, including BRAF, RET, and NTRK inhibitors, are unavailable. Furthermore, although the standard 24 mg daily dose is recommended, a lower initial dosage may be effective for patients unable to tolerate the full dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40581716What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.