ArticleSpinal cord2025
A qualitative study of experiencing cauda equina syndrome and its aftercare in the UK.
Article in Spinal cord, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designQualitative, semi structured interviews.
objectivesCauda Equina Syndrome (CES) is a neurological emergency that can cause permanent disability to the lower limbs, including pain, weakness, and bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction. There is little evidence on the lived experience of patients with different severities of CES. This study sought to address this.
settingThe interviews were conducted with persons who had experienced CES and been operated on for this condition in the UK.
methodsA sampling frame was used on a pre-existing database to select a maximum variation sample. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis supported by NVivo.
resultsData saturation was achieved with 22 patients (12 female, 10 male) of whom 10 had CES-incomplete and 12 had CES-complete. Average age was 46 years and time since the operation was 62 months. Most interviews took place at the patients' home or workplace. Data analysis identified 4 main data themes: (1) Varying priorities of physical health; (2) A fragmented healthcare service; (3) The process of adjustment; and 4) Anticipatory anxiety and diminished sense of self-worth.
conclusionThe identified themes confirm that CES can be a chronic condition, which requires holistic support to address the long-term outcomes. This highlights the importance of using the Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS) in CES research studies to record these outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.