ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025
Reliance into Action : Understanding EMA Documents to Streamline Reliance for Marketing Authorization Applications.
Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regulatory Reliance in Latin America: Opportunities and Implementation Challenges for International Pharmaceutical Companies.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Review
- Harmonizing health: a global analysis of pharmaceutical regulatory activities by international regulatory organizations.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to data gathered from across EU pharmaceutical trade associations, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is one of the most frequently selected reference regulatory authority (RRA) for reliance procedures due its transparency, detailed decision-making reflected on its public assessment reports and easy access to information related to the assessment of medicines. This review discusses the implementation of unilateral reliance pathways for marketing authorization applications (MAAs) based on EMA assessment. The EMA established a focus group dedicated to reliance in 2022, with the primary aim of understanding the opportunities and hurdles encountered by European industry when using the EMA as RRA in global regulatory filings. A survey conducted among industry stakeholders revealed significant benefits of reliance pathways, including reduced approval timelines and decreased inquiries from relying authorities. However, the survey also highlighted persistent hurdles that hinder the benefits of unilateral reliance pathway, such as variability in documentation requirements and a lack of consistency across the documents requested by each national regulatory authority (NRA) when relying on EMA assessment. The findings highlight the need for collaboration between regulatory authorities and industry to streamline reliance processes and data requirements to make informed reliance decisions ultimately improving global access to safe, effective, and quality-assured medical products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.