Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581695›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2025

Reliance into Action : Understanding EMA Documents to Streamline Reliance for Marketing Authorization Applications.

Isabelle Colmagne Poulard, Susanne Ausborn, Martin Harvey Allchurch, Victoria Palmi, Alberto Ganan, Angelika Joos, Andrew Deavin, Corentin Beauchesne, Priti Shah, Jyothsna Krishnan and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isabelle Colmagne PoulardMerck, 1 route de Crassier, Eysins, 1262, Switzerland. isabelle.colmagne-poulard@merckgroup.com.
Susanne AusbornRoche, Grenzacher Strasse 124, Basel, 4070, Switzerland.
Martin Harvey AllchurchEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, Amsterdam, 1083 HS, The Netherlands.
Victoria PalmiEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, Amsterdam, 1083 HS, The Netherlands.
Alberto GananEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, Amsterdam, 1083 HS, The Netherlands.
Angelika JoosMSD, Boulevard du Souverain 25, Brussels, 1170, Belgium.
Andrew DeavinGSK, 20 Avenue Fleming, Wavre, 1300, Belgium.
Corentin BeauchesneAlexion, Av. Diagonal, 615, Les Corts, Barcelona, 08028, Spain.
Priti ShahAstra Zeneca, City House, Hills Rd, Cambridge, UK.
Jyothsna KrishnanEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), Neo Building, Rue Montoyer 51, box 3, Bruxelles, 1000, Belgium.
Chaima AskriSartorius, Am Flughafen 16, 79108, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to data gathered from across EU pharmaceutical trade associations, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is one of the most frequently selected reference regulatory authority (RRA) for reliance procedures due its transparency, detailed decision-making reflected on its public assessment reports and easy access to information related to the assessment of medicines. This review discusses the implementation of unilateral reliance pathways for marketing authorization applications (MAAs) based on EMA assessment. The EMA established a focus group dedicated to reliance in 2022, with the primary aim of understanding the opportunities and hurdles encountered by European industry when using the EMA as RRA in global regulatory filings. A survey conducted among industry stakeholders revealed significant benefits of reliance pathways, including reduced approval timelines and decreased inquiries from relying authorities. However, the survey also highlighted persistent hurdles that hinder the benefits of unilateral reliance pathway, such as variability in documentation requirements and a lack of consistency across the documents requested by each national regulatory authority (NRA) when relying on EMA assessment. The findings highlight the need for collaboration between regulatory authorities and industry to streamline reliance processes and data requirements to make informed reliance decisions ultimately improving global access to safe, effective, and quality-assured medical products.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug IndustryMarketingEuropean UnionHumansCPP/eCPPEMAManufacturing authorization applicationRegulatory convergenceReliance

Identifiers

PMID40581695
PMCPMC12446411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.