Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581674›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Developing ultrasound-based machine learning models for accurate differentiation between sclerosing adenosis and invasive ductal carcinoma.

Guohao Liu, Na Yang, Yikun Qu, Guangxin Chen, Guiqiong Wen, Gai Li, Li Deng, Yuanqi Mai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guohao Liu *Center of Scientific Research, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Na Yang *Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of Jilin Medical University, Jilin, China.
Yikun QuDepartment of General Surgery, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China.
Guangxin ChenSchool of Medical Imaging, Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, China.
Guiqiong WenDepartment of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.
Gai LiDepartment of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Hospital of Jilin Medical University, Jilin, China.
Li DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang, China. dengli1981182024@gmail.com.
Yuanqi MaiCenter of Scientific Research, Maoming People's Hospital, Maoming, China. maiyuanqi888@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0324-4080

Funding

Health Technology Capability Enhancement Project of Jilin Province 2024B011Joint Guidance Project of the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang LH2021H109The 19th Batch of Jilin Province Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Funding Project, China 2023QN37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a machine learning model using breast ultrasound images to improve the non-invasive differential diagnosis between Sclerosing Adenosis (SA) and Invasive Ductal Carcinoma (IDC). MATERIALS AND

methods2046 ultrasound images from 772 SA and IDC patients were collected, Regions of Interest (ROI) were delineated, and features were extracted. The dataset was split into training and test cohorts, and feature selection was performed by correlation coefficients and Recursive Feature Elimination. 10 classifiers with Grid Search and 5-fold cross-validation were applied during model training. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden index were used to model evaluation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed for model interpretation. Another 224 ROIs of 84 patients from other hospitals were used for external validation.

resultsFor the ROI-level model, XGBoost with 18 features achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9758 (0.9654-0.9847) in the test cohort and 0.9906 (0.9805-0.9973) in the validation cohort. For the patient-level model, logistic regression with 9 features achieved an AUC of 0.9653 (0.9402-0.9859) in the test cohort and 0.9846 (0.9615-0.9978) in the validation cohort. The feature "Original shape Major Axis Length" was identified as the most important, with its value positively correlated with a higher likelihood of the sample being IDC. Feature contributions for specific ROIs were visualized as well.

conclusionWe developed explainable, ultrasound-based machine learning models with high performance for differentiating SA and IDC, offering a potential non-invasive tool for improved differential diagnosis. KEY POINTS: Question Accurately distinguishing between sclerosing adenosis (SA) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) in a non-invasive manner has been a diagnostic challenge. Findings Explainable, ultrasound-based machine learning models with high performance were developed for differentiating SA and IDC, and validated well in external validation cohort. Critical relevance These models provide non-invasive tools to reduce misdiagnoses of SA and improve early detection for IDC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastFibrocystic Breast DiseaseMachine LearningUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMiddle AgedDifferential diagnosisInvasive ductal carcinomaMachine learningSclerosing adenosisUltrasound images

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.