SynthesisJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Effects of cilostazol for in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cilostazol Contributes to Risk Reduction of Stroke Recurrence without Mediating a Reduction of Blood Pressure: Results from CSPS.com.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Trial
- Carotid Restenosis: Incidence, Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThere is some controversy regarding drug therapy to prevent in-stent restenosis (ISR) after carotid artery stenting. In recent years, cilostazol has received increasing research attention. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of cilostazol on the outcome of ISR after carotid stenting.
methodsA meta-analysis was carried out to identify the clinical trials that had been published up to 22 December 2024. The databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang have all been queried. The study population was composed of patients with stent carotid heart disease who were receiving cilostazol. Results included in-stent-restenosis, ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality. Publications were reviewed according to the Cochrane Handbook and the guidelines set out in the Preferred Reporting Project for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 2020). The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I).
resultsThis study was registered with INPLASY (number INPLASY202510004). A total of 1975 patients were included in 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 non-RCTs. A statistically significant reduction in ISR was observed for antiplatelet regimens including cilostazol compared to the control group (OR = 0.27, 95%CI: 0.13 ~ 0.54, P<0.01, I
conclusionsCilostazol was associated with less postoperative carotid stent restenosis, with no statistically significant difference in ischemic stroke and all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.