ArticleBMC medical education2025
Students' experiences of interprofessional learning by simulating the Swedish concept of coordinated individual care in primary healthcare: a qualitative analysis.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Confronted with the real world: how final-year medical students experience interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe number of students from medical study programs undertaking clinical education and training in primary healthcare is increasing in Sweden. At the same time, the number of patients with complex needs and multimorbidity is also increasing, calling for interprofessional collaboration of care. PURPOSE: The study's purpose was to describe students' experiences of interprofessional learning (IPL) from a person-centred perspective in a clinical primary care context using an authentic patient case and simulating a coordinated individual plan (CIP) meeting. The research questions were: (1) Do students perceive the CIP meeting as a relevant IPL activity within clinical training? and (2) What is the novelty of using the CIP meeting with regards to the ICCAS (Interprofessional Collaborative Competency Attainment Survey) - self-assessment scale of IPL competences? METHOD AND MATERIAL: The current study is based on a qualitative evaluation of 12 learning activities carried out over a one-year period. Activities were performed as simulation-based CIP meetings within clinical education, and interprofessional training under supervision. In total, 87 students from 13 different medical programs participated in the activities. Qualitative content analysis was used.
resultsThe identified theme was Interprofessional collaborations without hierarchy within a patient-centred setting, and consisted of five categories: (1) patients in center; (2) one's own professional identity; (3) professional identity of others; (4) teamwork and collaboration; and (5) non-hierarchical positioning.
conclusionsA novel finding in this study was the students' experience of creating new knowledge about their own professional identity and non-hierarchical working practices. Additionally, CIP meetings were perceived as a relevant IPL activity in the clinical training of the students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.