Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581614›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025

Effect of COVID-19 vaccination appointment letters on uptake by sociodemographic characteristics: a regression discontinuity analysis in Sweden, December 2020 to September 2021.

Georgios Varotsis, Ulf Hammar, Carl Bonander, Per Lundmark, Beatrice Kennedy, Maria F Gomez, Mats Martinell, Oliver J Dyar, Anna Sarkadi, Robert Kristiansson and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Georgios VarotsisMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ulf HammarMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Carl BonanderSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1189-9950
Per LundmarkMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Beatrice KennedyMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0066-4814
Maria F GomezDiabetic Complications Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Malmö, Sweden.
Mats MartinellDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Oliver J DyarChild Health and Parenting (CHAP), Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna SarkadiChild Health and Parenting (CHAP), Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Robert KristianssonDepartment of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helena SvalerydDepartment of Economics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tove FallMolecular Epidemiology, Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Riksbankens JubileumsfondSwedish Research Council 2021-02716Swedish Research Council 2021-05450Swedish Research Council for Health 2020-00962Swedish Research Council for Health 2023-01104Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare 2020-00962Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare 2023-01104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring high vaccination coverage is vital, particularly during a pandemic. While pre-booked appointment letters have shown promise in vaccination campaigns, their effectiveness in specific sociodemographic groups remains to be explored. Our study evaluated the effect of pre-booked appointment letters on COVID-19 vaccine uptake within different sociodemographic groups using a quasi-experimental methodology. In Uppsala County, Sweden, residents born between 1962 and 1971 received pre-booked COVID-19 vaccination letters starting 24 May 2021, while younger residents received SMS prompts for self-booking starting 7 June 2021. Through a regression discontinuity design, we used the intervention cut-off at birth year 1971 to assess the effectiveness of the letters to increase vaccine uptake compared to the SMS campaign. Our analysis included 96 194 individuals born between 1962 and 1981, examining vaccination within 90 days post-eligibility as primary outcome. We investigated effects within sociodemographic groups, assessed household spillover effects, and performed negative control analyses using neighbouring counties. Adults just above the cut-off had an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI 1.10-1.53) of being vaccinated than those just below, with a 1.97 percentage point increase (95% CI: 0.45-3.50) from a baseline of 91.95%. The intervention showed effectiveness within most sociodemographic strata. No effects were found in negative control counties, nor were there household spillover effects. Pre-booked appointment letters are effective at boosting vaccination uptake, even in diverse sociodemographic groups. While our findings come from COVID-19 vaccination, they align with evidence from various immunization programs, suggesting that personalized communications can achieve equitable vaccine coverage across different healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinationVaccination CoverageAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisSARS-CoV-2Sociodemographic FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID40581614
PMCPMC12311344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.