ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
Effect of COVID-19 vaccination appointment letters on uptake by sociodemographic characteristics: a regression discontinuity analysis in Sweden, December 2020 to September 2021.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ensuring high vaccination coverage is vital, particularly during a pandemic. While pre-booked appointment letters have shown promise in vaccination campaigns, their effectiveness in specific sociodemographic groups remains to be explored. Our study evaluated the effect of pre-booked appointment letters on COVID-19 vaccine uptake within different sociodemographic groups using a quasi-experimental methodology. In Uppsala County, Sweden, residents born between 1962 and 1971 received pre-booked COVID-19 vaccination letters starting 24 May 2021, while younger residents received SMS prompts for self-booking starting 7 June 2021. Through a regression discontinuity design, we used the intervention cut-off at birth year 1971 to assess the effectiveness of the letters to increase vaccine uptake compared to the SMS campaign. Our analysis included 96 194 individuals born between 1962 and 1981, examining vaccination within 90 days post-eligibility as primary outcome. We investigated effects within sociodemographic groups, assessed household spillover effects, and performed negative control analyses using neighbouring counties. Adults just above the cut-off had an odds ratio of 1.3 (95% CI 1.10-1.53) of being vaccinated than those just below, with a 1.97 percentage point increase (95% CI: 0.45-3.50) from a baseline of 91.95%. The intervention showed effectiveness within most sociodemographic strata. No effects were found in negative control counties, nor were there household spillover effects. Pre-booked appointment letters are effective at boosting vaccination uptake, even in diverse sociodemographic groups. While our findings come from COVID-19 vaccination, they align with evidence from various immunization programs, suggesting that personalized communications can achieve equitable vaccine coverage across different healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.