Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581365›Full record

Observational studyQJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians2025

Time Allocation in Clinical Training (TACT): national study reveals Resident Doctors spend four hours on admin for every hour with patients.

Sammy Arab, Karanjot Chhatwal, Thomas Hargreaves, Michela Sorbini, Sara El-Toukhy, Chiara J Vedi, Yusuf Alghabra, Jude Merzah, Stuart D Rosen

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Competence over case count: rethinking paediatric orthopaedic training.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2026
    Article
  2. The Hidden Curriculum in the Postgraduate Psychiatry Trainee Program.Indian journal of psychological medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sammy ArabImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Karanjot ChhatwalImperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0002-8061-6237
Thomas HargreavesBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Michela SorbiniSt Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Sara El-ToukhyNottingham Medical School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Chiara J VediEaling Hospital, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Yusuf AlghabraFaculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Jude MerzahColchester General Hospital, East Suffolk & North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Essex, UK.
Stuart D RosenNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-0037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResident Doctors (RDs) in the UK must balance clinical training with non-clinical administrative tasks. Concerns increase over how these tasks impact their professional development, job satisfaction and patient care. The shift toward consultant-delivered care has led to a redistribution of responsibilities, increasing administrative burden on RDs.

aimsThis study aims to quantify how RDs allocate time between patient-facing and non-patient-facing tasks and assess impact on job satisfaction.

designNational multicentre observational cohort study. METHODOLOGY: The Time Allocation in Clinical Training study is a multicentre, observational cohort study conducted over seven months (January-July 2024) at secondary NHS centres. 137 RDs, from Foundation Year 1 to Specialty Training Year 8, were observed for 4-hour periods, with time tracked using stopwatches for five task categories. An optional survey assessed job satisfaction, rated on a five-point Likert scale.

resultsRDs spent 73.0% of their time on non-patient-facing tasks, and 17.9% on patient-facing activities. Women spent more time on non-patient-facing tasks compared to men (75.0% vs. 69.9%, P = 0.03). Junior RDs (Foundation years and Core trainees) spent significantly less time on patient-facing tasks compared to senior RDs (ST6-8) (38.4% vs. 17.8%; P = 0.004). Most RDs (62%) reported dissatisfaction with the administrative burden. Electronic health record users spent significantly more time on administrative tasks than paper-based record users (44.1% vs. 37.3%; P = 0.02).

conclusionsThe study reveals a significant imbalance between clinical and administrative tasks, with excessive administrative workload contributing to RD dissatisfaction. Streamlining administrative duties and integrating digital solutions is crucial for improving job satisfaction, clinical development and healthcare delivery in the NHS.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyJob SatisfactionWorkloadAdultFemaleHumansMaleState MedicineTime FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40581365
PMCPMC12676270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.