Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40581339›Full record

ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2025

Endo-Histo foundational fusion model: a novel artificial intelligence for assessing histologic remission and response to therapy in ulcerative colitis clinical trial.

Marietta Iacucci, Giovanni Santacroce, Pablo Meseguer, Alejandro Diéguez, Rocio Del Amor, Bisi Bode Kolawole, Ujwala Chaudhari, Irene Zammarchi, Brian Hayes, Rory Crotty and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02589665 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY3074828 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02589665 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY3074828 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2015 to 2019Enrolled249ConditionsUlcerative ColitisArmsMirikizumab, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Marietta IacucciAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3142-9550
Giovanni SantacroceAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0544-0414
Pablo MeseguerInstituto Universitario de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología Centarada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Alejandro DiéguezInstituto Universitario de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología Centarada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Rocio Del AmorInstituto Universitario de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología Centarada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Bisi Bode KolawoleSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Ujwala ChaudhariSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Irene ZammarchiAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Brian HayesDepartment of Histopathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Rory CrottyDepartment of Histopathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Davide ZardoDepartment of Pathology, San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Yasuharu MaedaAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Miguel Puga-TejadaAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ilaria DitonnoAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Valentina VadoriSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Louise BurkeDepartment of Histopathology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Ferdinando D'AmicoGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Subrata GhoshAPC Microbiome Ireland, College of Medicine and Health, University College of Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1713-7797
Enrico GrisanSchool of Engineering, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Valery NaranjoInstituto Universitario de Investigación e Innovación en Tecnología Centarada en el Ser Humano, HUMAN-tech, Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.

Funding

Eli Lilly and Company
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsArtificial intelligence (AI)-enabled endoscopy and histology offer accurate, objective, and rapid assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). Emerging multi-source AI models may enhance standardized disease evaluation and outcome prediction. This investigation aimed to develop a novel AI model fusing endoscopic and histologic features to improve the assessment of disease remission and response to therapy in UC clinical trials.

methodsA novel multimodal AI model was developed that fuses endoscopic videos and histologic whole-slide images from a Phase 2 clinical trial of Mirikizumab in UC (NCT02589665). Informative endoscopic frames were predicted using convolutional neural networks and processed with BioMedCLIP, while histologic features were extracted using the CONCH foundational model. Multimodal features were then integrated via multi-head self-attention to generate a patient-level assessment. Model performance for assessing histologic remission (HR) and treatment response at weeks 12 and 52, based on histologic endpoints, was evaluated by cross-validation.

resultsThe fusion model outperformed single-modality assessments for HR, achieving a sensitivity of 89.72% (95% CI, 82.35-94.76), specificity of 89.67% (95% CI, 84.34-93.67), and accuracy of 89.69% (95% CI, 85.61-92.94). It showed a sensitivity of 97.96% (95% CI, 89.15-99.95), specificity of 86.84% (95% CI, 71.91-95.59), and accuracy of 93.10% (95% CI, 85.59-97.43) for assessing HR at week 52. Substantial agreement was observed between the AI-fusion model and central readout.

conclusionThis novel tool significantly advances precision medicine in clinical trials by potentially standardizing central readouts and enabling automated disease assessment.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedArtificial IntelligenceColitis, UlcerativeColonAdultClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicColonoscopyFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeVideo RecordingAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedendoscopic remissionfoundation modelhistologic improvementhistologic remissionmultimodal fusionpersonalised medicineresponse to therapyulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID40581339
PMCPMC12239202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.