ArticleJournal of substance use and addiction treatment2025
Reducing stigma in primary care toward people who use drugs: A pilot study exploring the promise and limits of stigma training.
Article in Journal of substance use and addiction treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care can improve health for people who use drugs (PWUD), but stigma among healthcare professionals impedes patient engagement. Past research suggests training reduces stigmatizing professional attitudes, but effects on other aspects of healthcare stigma are largely unknown. This pilot study tests whether stigma reduction training changes three stigma processes toward PWUD in primary care: attitudes, intentions to provide care, and workplace culture.
methodsThe study delivered a two-hour substance use stigma training to clinical (e.g., physicians) and non-clinical (e.g., reception staff) primary care professionals in Michigan. Pre- and post-training survey data were collected, and a one-hour qualitative focus group was conducted with a subset of respondents. Cohen's d and paired t-tests assessed changes in stigma. The study analyzed qualitative data using thematic analysis.
resultsFifty-one professionals completed surveys, and five professionals participated in the focus group. Training reduced stigmatizing attitudes toward PWUD (e.g., improvement in the Medical Condition Regard Scale d = 0.499, p = 0.007), but did not change intention to enact stigma or workplace culture. Qualitative data suggested training promoted empathy toward PWUD and explained best practices, but training also revealed gaps between evidence and current clinic practices. Participants noted that external factors that training does not alter, e.g. controlled substance prescribing regulations, may disincentivize professional engagement with PWUD.
conclusionsThis pilot study explores the promise and limits of training for altering professional stigma toward PWUD in primary care. Although training readily reduces attitudinal forms of stigma, other interventions are likely needed to reduce stigmatizing professional behaviors and primary care environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.