ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
Integrating eye health into a child health policy in Tanzania: global and national influences.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From national strategy to local implementation: a policy analysis of eye health integration and financing in Kenya's devolved health system.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Congenital eye malformations and their impact on the health status of the Mexican population.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global consensus has shifted to focus on how children can be supported to not only 'survive' but to 'thrive'. Blindness and visual loss in early childhood undermine a child's ability to thrive, affecting psychomotor, cognitive, and social development leading to life-long consequences for educational attainment, employment, economic and social status, and wellbeing. Despite this, eye health for children under the age of 5 years has been neglected, and not politically prioritized. In Tanzania, policy makers decided in 2019 to include eye conditions in the national Integrated Management of Newborn and Childhood Illness (IMNCI) programme, despite eye health not being part of the global World Health Organization/UNICEF IMNCI strategy. We conducted a qualitative policy analysis to explore enabling factors and barriers to this policy change. The interviews were semi-structured with key actors selected purposively and by snowball sampling, including those with a role in child and eye health at national and global levels. We used an adapted Shiffman and Smith framework (Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet 2007;370:1370-9) to guide the interviews and analysis, and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research for planning and reporting. This study shows how rapidly one country altered its overall child health policy to include eye health, driven by good quality collaborative research and collective action (cohesive policy community) which importantly included co-design with the decision makers (Ministry of Health actors). These developments coincided with the shift in the international agenda moving from 'survive to thrive' in child health which was leveraged to include eye care in the national strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.