ArticleExperimental and molecular pathology2025
Polymerase Ѳ inhibitors combinations with approved and investigational agents in patient-derived tumor multi-cell type (mct) spheroids.
Article in Experimental and molecular pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The potential of novobiocin, recently identified to be a DNA POLѲ inhibitor, to augment cancer chemotherapy was explored in the late 1980s and early 1990s in tumor cells, tumor-bearing mice and in Phase 1 clinical trial in combination with cyclophosphamide or cisplatin. Genetic alterations which may increase or decrease POLѲ inhibitor effects have been elucidated. Thirty patient-derived tumor cell lines with known BRCA, ATM, ATR, POLѲ, XRCC1, PALB2, PARP1, LIG3 alterations as well as know gLOH% and MSI status were screened in a mct-spheroid assay (tumor cells, endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells) with a POLѲ inhibitor, novobiocin, ART-558, and RP6685, alone or in simultaneous combination with a FDA-approved or investigational anticancer small molecule with a 7-day exposure and a CellTiter-Glo 3D luminescence endpoint. As single agents, the POLѲ inhibitors had little or no cytotoxicity. In simultaneous combination with ART-558, talazoparib produced greater-than-additive cytotoxicity at the highest concentrations of the POLѲ inhibitors in the 922,993-354-T-J3-PDC endometrial serous carcinoma mct-spheroids. Activity of the Chk1/2 inhibitor prexasertib was potentiated by either ART-558 or RP6685 in the 922,993-354-T-J3 mct-spheroids. The combination of POLѲ inhibitors ART-558 and RP6685, and the Chk1/2 inhibitor prexasertib produced up to 1 log increase in cytotoxicity in the 922,993-354-T-J3 mct-spheroids. Regions of potentiation were evident in the 922,993-354-T-J3-PDC endometrial carcinoma survival surface plots at the highest concentration of paclitaxel tested, while regions of potentiation were evident in the paclitaxel mid-concentrations of the 299,254-011-R-J1-PDC melanoma mct-spheroids survival surface plots as determined by the Bliss independence calculation. DNA POLѲ is recruited to DNA double-strand breaks as a component of repair. POLѲ allosteric inhibitors, novobiocin, ART558 and RP-6685, have entered clinical trial. The current study explores the cytotoxicity of POLѲ inhibitors in combination with anticancer drugs and investigational agents in patient-derived cell lines grown as mct-spheroids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.