ArticleThe American journal of case reports2025
Paradoxical Embolism Through Patent Foramen Ovale: A Case Report of Thrombus in Transit.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Embolus in transit vs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of venous thromboembolism, particularly in the setting of recent surgery. This report presents the case of a 41-year-old woman with paradoxical cerebral thromboembolism due to thrombus-in-transit via a patent foramen ovale, highlighting the importance of early recognition and intervention. CASE REPORT The patient was brought into the Emergency Department following syncope and head injury, 2 weeks following elective varicose vein surgery. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography confirmed a saddle pulmonary embolism. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain after head injury demonstrated acute ischemic stroke in the left middle cerebral artery territory. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed a highly mobile thrombus extending from the right atrium through an interatrial defect into the left atrium and prolapsing in the left ventricle. The patient was commenced on anticoagulation, but due to the high risk of recurrent embolic events, she underwent emergent pulmonary embolectomy, atrial thrombectomy, and patent foramen ovale closure. She was discharged on apixaban for extensive deep venous thrombosis and remained well on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS This case demonstrates the importance of considering paradoxical embolism in patients presenting with both stroke and pulmonary embolism, particularly in the setting of recent surgery. Careful assessment of the patient's risk profile, combined with a collaborative discussion among all relevant specialties, plays an important role in determining the best treatment strategy for managing an entrapped thrombus within a patent foramen ovale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.