ArticleIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2025
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Clinicopathological features and outcome-Real-world experience.
Article in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare neoplasms with diverse clinical profiles and treatment outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment modalities and survival outcomes of patients with GISTs treated at a tertiary care hospital in India.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 51 patients with GISTs. Data collected included tumor location, gender, presenting complaints, staging, pathological data, National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk category, treatment offered and outcome. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 23. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data and significance was determined with p-values < 0.05.
resultsTotal 51 patients of GIST were included in this study. Mean age of presentation was 54.38 ± 13.2 and 61% (31/51) patients were male. In this study, most common site of involvement was the small bowel (25/51), followed by stomach (24/51). Most common presenting feature was pain in abdomen (59% 30/51), followed by gastrointestinal bleed. At diagnosis, localized disease was present in a majority of patients and metastasis was present in only 10% (5/51) of cases. Among non-metastatic disease, spindle cell morphology was predominant (71.7%) and in metastatic disease; mixed cell morphology was more common (60%). Mitotic activity (0.034) and CD34 positivity (p = 0.046) were significantly associated with metastasis. According to NIH risk classification, 33% were low risk, 27% intermediate risk and 39% high risk. Imatinib was given to 75% of patients, while 25% received no drug therapy.
conclusionGISTs predominantly affect proximal bowel and metastatic disease is very uncommon. Surgical resection with adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor in selected patient is the main treatment with good survival rate. CD34 positivity and mitotic activity was significantly associated with metastasis, indicating its potential as a marker for predicting metastatic spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40580416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.